...Except for child welfare concerns, if you are a children's rights advocate. Anti-children's rights is now pressuring me to delete all of my friends list. The way it would likely work is that if I delete who I'm told to, the list will grow to none on my friends' list "because we don't want him to have friends. That children's rights sperg to have friends". Except *I* and MY attitude towards life decides that, NOT you, anti-CR.
Meddling relative that steps-in all the time. That's how I see anti-children's rights currently.
Interesting how they even had the gall to use "closed-gill" gaslighting, on my penis. That is something intended for pornography addicts, whereas anyone can see my computer and all the pornography on it, meaning the very opposite. That's the future plans as well.
EDIT: The word "penis" is necessary language, and is not intended for sexual gaslighting, hence Ethan Edwards is the one fetishizing the word. It's just normal medical jargon. That's all, and as long as it means that, it can stay. "But I don't want it because it is too triggering". Read around it, is all I can say. You are acting triggered to beg for sympathy you don't deserve, being the victimizing narcissist that you are, and also feigned VIRTUOUS pedophile. You shall not make sexual remarks upon my writing without clear evidence that I had erotic intent, and you shall assign someone else to read my writing who is on my side, namely Nick or Todd, and any refusal to do any of this will flag you as a predatory abuser of pedophiles, at least by my standard, thus not representative of VirPed values at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.