Monday, March 15, 2021

"Young friends": Understanding a pedophile trend (including the morality of such adult behavior)

 Many people today hate pedophiles because "I don't want them around my children". This refers to the anti-contact faction of the pedophile community these days, and is associated with the Virtuous Pedophiles community. Many people appeal to commonsense, in that being friends with a child as a pedophile is wrong. Because "I'm the pedophile in the relationship" is abuse, but beyond that, morality becomes complicated.

Ultimately, it refers to the girdle of the pedophile, in terms of entitlement. Entitlement is denoted in the New Testament by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to wanting things from children to the point of seeking to impose said item onto them, leading to theft/abuse. When perceived as a sexual slight from the child, it is denoted by the Greek root word πορνεία (Latin: porneia), and refers to the moral crime of fornication or self-defilement. Basically, contact with a child for sexual purposes defiles the person, thus makes the abuser dirty.

Basically, what is your intent in relation to the child, including the veracity of said intent. If you constantly want sex from the child, it is sin. If the child is forced by relatives to be friends with you, and they'd rather be friends with their peers. Basically, any adult entitlement in the friendship makes it abusive. Think rectangular arrows towards the child, or else a begging hand. If such items of entitlement exist, the relationship is abusive, and the child would likely perceive it.

When is the ideal setup for such a friendship? A family setting, where there is another reason why, that isn't a rationalization. Parenting, when done properly and gentle, renders the parent as the best friend of the child, but in a mature, responsible way. Someone close to the family might want to be friends as well. All adults should be friends with children, when dealing with them, or at least trusted acquaintances.

We want all adults to have a certain type of girdle in relationship to children, namely one that shelters children without punishment, control, or spousification. Pedophilia is spousification stated in medical format. An parent/adult who spousifies children literally believes the child to be his/her spouse, and this is a form of abuse. A more healthy pedophile would likely be friends with children as a part of an official function or a family function. Going out of one's way to find children, such as hanging around playgrounds, is creepy and a form of abuse, if the child perceives it as such, meaning the former word. Any adult who defends such behavior is deserving of punishment.

Pedophiles often are the adults you see around children with very strong self-control, and who never get angry. Think the quiet, introverted type who is a "natural" with children. They may be more cautious about helping children, in terms of consent, than other adults who work with children. There is a reason for this - they have to take up this attitude in order to survive...Pedophilic attraction is projectory in nature, in most cases, meaning a thread in between an encasement. Yes, an antisocial parent. In my experience, it is a slight yet pleasurable spray onto the child's body, but no urge to do anything towards the child.

Let us be very clear. Friendship with a child is NOT a right for everyone. It is an earned right, meaning if you take disrespectful or entitled attitudes towards children. If a child hates you, that is YOUR fault, not the child's. If the parents don't trust you, assume there is a reason for that. No adult deserves friendship with a child, and all are deserving of the hatred and distrust from children merely for existing...Parents have the right to issue parent law, and parent law is binding on pedophiles. Remember that. Even from me, the parent hater in chief.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

The word "no": Why children need to hear the word "no" seldom (meaning almost never)

Many parents think that children need to hear the word "no" frequent and often. This is a common attitude on the part of American ...