Many people misunderstand the anti-parent system of children's justice that I am about to enstate in the children's rights community, and all over the several United States of America. I am a sexually entitled, depraved parent to every single child. I am called to put the parents down, and the survivors up who have the humility and decency to imply their title in relation to their children. What is the number one cause of child abuse? Entitlement. What is their main abuser? The legal and natural parent that identifies itself.
Entitlement, as a concept, is based on the Tenth Commandment, in Exodus 20:17:
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbor.
The Hebrew word translated "covet" is נמחוד (Latin: lachmod) and refers to not only wanting, but wanting to the point of seeking to impose on a child, leading to theft/abuse. The want itself, when portrayed that way, is entitlement, and in the New Testament, is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to the attitude of the parent or other adult, namely the entitled attitude of "I am the parent, and you are the child, and I have the right to punish/control/correct you until age 18, and only then will I allow you to leave my [iron grasp]". I add the last one for effect. You don't get it. Unless you are one of God's chosen gentle parents, and surrendered to the Divine Custody of His Church, or else a newbie to the church, you are my abuser and I will flip you burgers and expose all the dirt you have underneath that lawful facade. God tallies parents.
There are two types of abuser, according to my anti-parent policing system. Entitled parents and struggling parents. There is no such thing as a parent. Abuse itself is the offense perceived by the child with just cause. When the abuse is openly defended by a right, or as a visible attitude towards children, it is entitled abuse. As a righteous judge, I am more concerned about judging entitlement than counting offenses, and it involves marking certain parents for deletion with pen and stencil, and shunning them from all sight, and possibly calling the authorities when the child gives consent, given the child victim's age and development.
Gentle parents are not entitled, thus not a threat.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.