"We are the police": Why law enforcement personality traits are not a good tell for an abuser (entitlement is)

 In 2016-18, there was an investigation carried out though uncanny means of fornication, with the switchboard bearing the sin-guilt, meaning all higher authority over said events, meaning all organizing authority over said event, meaning also all available legal loopholes permitting the unlawful and lascivious carnage against children. Those that did not apologize by now will pay, either in this world or the next. I am NOT a blind fan of the police. The police didn't even cause it, as much as anti-CR and the judiciary. Anti-CR is the REAL enemy, in my case...Many think all abusers have a law enforcement personality, meaning they claim to be the police when they really aren't. 

"Invoking law" isn't the only form of domestic violence, nor is the invocation of law always a form of domestic abuse. Depends what methods and what purpose. If my mom were to suddenly be shouting curse names at me, and threatening to expose damaging information, I'd have the right to temporarily restrain her, as long as I explained the reasons why I was doing so. Did I regret it later? I really, really did. Dehumanizing. But I saw no other option to communicate. I hope I never have to do that again. Under my Christian beliefs, children do have the right to invoke law upon their parents to get what they need. I usually would issue a divine warning in the verbal tense.

What is the number one method of any type of child abuse? Vent. If I were to sexually abuse a child, it would be due to venting stress from an isolating and alienating - "At least you understand, my darling" - thereby shutting out the rest of the world, just for her. Most parents, under the same amount of entitled "stress", would spank, strike, and physically strike their child. They may yell and constrain their children with verbal abuse...Most abusers of children are not peacekeepers, but are instead like my abusive parents - hotheads who cannot satisfactorily manage the stress of life, and take it out on their child. In the 1950s, most men vented on their wives, and even though it was illegal, it happened anyway. Police had nothing to do with it except that the WORST offenders were in the police. Every man was doing it. Today, you can replace "every man" with "every parent". A slave society. A servile society. Children kicked around the streets and store aisles like unwanted trashed.

What is the most common cause of child abuse? Lack of individual responsibility in parents and other adults, throwing up their hands in a mea culpa, blaming "pedophiles" when everyone else has added to the stew as well, and adults who have clinical pedophilia aren't even the biggest contributors. Most child abusers instead identify as "parents" or "adults" in a first-person manner. We don't want anyone to identify by that glorified title. Instead, they should imply their parent status in relation to their children.

All adults, by default, are marked for deletion by God, with only a few adults being chosen, by virtue of non-abusive and respectful choices towards children, will be saved from eternal torment. The rest will be annihilated and destroyed. Adults are to submit to their children in the adversarial that mankind has disobeyed the needs of God, and needs to submit to Him. A child is in place of God, and is extended by God for providence from parents. Child abuse happens when this beholden bond to children is violated by the parents' actions and the parents' actions alone. It's called individual responsibility, and abusers lack it..."The police" aren't committing the abuse (though many abusers repicate the police). Parents and other adults are, meaning individuals. I blame the individual, and only use demographics for reference and not official policy as an advocate.