Wednesday, February 24, 2021

Understanding my case of autism (in relation to pedophilia)

 Many people do not understand my case of autism, in relation to a self-diagnosis of pedophilia. This is proof that autism is not always inherently a good thing, and many times is a bad influence in one's life. It is a nebulous condition, at best. I myself have it because it is that nebulous. I have found it to be shaped by my pedophilic disorder. 

Our movement does have a little "treatment portal" for pedophiles, that is heavily misused. The stereotypes that autistic pedophiles are narcissistic and navigational. Some forms of autism are conflated with a law enforcement personality, and the most dangerous are not narcissists. Picture a young kid with office suppies, asking for a REAL cash register, looking up child emancipation laws in their own state. They have a crush at school? They lobby their parents for child marriage, and the adults think it is cute in a "pro-social corrupting" way (I find such traits mighty attractive in girls - empowerment). The old autism classifications judge by possible career, in mini format. Me? Barrister off my medication, and justice of the peace while on my medication. I am a mixture of "justice of the peace" and "officer of the peace". 

Ultimately, however, I am a caseworker autistic, meaning I am compassionate and calm, but in a judgy, kind of arrogant way. I am actually willing to help and support struggling parents, but my philosophy is all about not enabling a behavioral addiction, as anything can be understood as an addiction, including child abuse habits. In an ideal America, pro-spanking parents would be shunned to the peripheries of society, where they would have no option but to break down, pray to God, and ask for help and mercy at the local CPS, or else be stormed by an afterhours raid...Don't feed the parent. Nurture the former child, and help the survivor instead.

I see everyone I deal with as a legal case, and judge certain people as innocent or guilty if suspect, or else I have no salvarory opinion on them, thus being saved. Being on my watch list means I have sentenced you to lawful consignment/condemnation. If I have not approached you at all regarding an individual moral legal issue, that means I have not considered you a threat in the least, and only see your good traits, and my treatment of you should reflect that. You have many warnings to clarify, then done - no perception of your existence, on my part, but maybe yours if you violate that condition.

I see adults as legal/clinical cases, meaning I can listen to an adult and reassure them like a therapist. With children, I see them as clinical cases. I can view a young girl from an attraction lens, perhaps with a short skirt on in wintertime, or I can take a step back and focus on her upset, listening and validating as she cries or complains. I might IEP - ify children, meaning see them not as a collective, but a mosaic of children, with different interests, different hobbies, different parents that they have to put up with.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Righteous co-sleeping: Why God wants parents to sleep next to their children

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice for a parent to make. This is a common attitude from American parents. Most ...