Friday, February 19, 2021

Pro-social marker, pro-social dead, pro-social avoidance/disappearance, pro-social burger: How Ban Adult Entitlement

 What is my job as a righteous judge over parents here in Berks County? Mark them as dead, then avoid them to the point of disappearance. Dead does not mean murder, as murder is wrong in all contexts, no matter what, because God values human life. *I* judge parents, and *I* am above them, as *I* have put the parents down like rabid watchdogs turning on their own, for PEDOPHILES are the head of every parent, controlling them by their consent like overbearing surrogate parents, giving them a good whipping for giving their child an unwarranted one, meaning whipping any child for any reason...I judge on the child's level, like a child.

It says in John 7:24 KJV:

Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.

Then Greek root word translated both "judge" and "judgment" is κλεπτω (Latin: kleptó) and refers to star-square courtroom judgment, presuming innocence beyond a reasonable doubt in all parents, but nonetheless being superficially suspicious of them, knowing that all parents, and all adults, are capable of harm or abuse towards a child. Mark. Char. Avoid. Invoice. Char self at all times. Invoice means expose the abuser as pure evil, interpreting the worst intend behind their words once convicted, while assuming the best while clarifying unintentional worry beforehand.

I am actually not one, by nature, to turn a blind eye to abuse. Freeze up in the store out of fear, panic, and anxiety is more like it. Now, I can tune the clutter out so that only what is important exists, meaning accepting that I can't solve anything. There is nothing my religion that specifically commands me to "help" others when there would be no help as a resolution long ago.

I spy from above, into a sea of parents in a public venue, a mosaic of parents of all races, colors, sexes, sizes, or other differentiating criteria, and I judge them equally, presuming innocence in all of them like an array spray, knocking all of them down, and putting myself down as well, to see which ones show. All of them, based on today's statistics, are capable of showing, but until they show, I must presume innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. If a child says something, or there is footage of an act with a child, there is absolute proof. Children never lie, but may be mistaken as to who the abuser is, especially when youthful age and emotional abuse/gaslighting is involved.

How would you know that your parenting views offended me? I'm gone, meaning you're gone because I have no perception of your presence. Not unless I want to think of you. Disappearance alone isn't a sign of shunning, but lack of answering the phone, or sending an intermediary to relay the message, is a sure sign that I want nothing to do with you, and am consigning a parent to their fate, determining that cord identified itself to me in an inappropriate venue, meaning outside parent law. "Parent law" means "I'm afraid for my child" and you accept a clear answer of self-protection from the other side, such as promise of egress from one's page kept, and the victim/now abuser making themselves such by chasing their now false stalker (the specific case I am referring to is resolved).

My procedure for abuse of pedophiles, or other abuse, is pro-social collect/bunker/hide, meaning press the adversary for entitlement, take screenshots, and silent share them on my page, going on the vigilante model of pro-social defamation. I am kind and polite, and trying to reassure their concerns, but if they take advantage of my concerns, I continue to be kind to my adversary as they calling me names and insulting me. An example would be:

Abuser of pedophiles: Go kill yourself, VP scum, with Todd and them

Me: I can tell you are concerned, and thank you for those concerns. What is the issue?

Abuser: You exist.

Me: So you don't think a pedophile can be treated?

Abuser: You don't deserve treatment. Only death, you sexual pervert and miscreant.

Me: You have been framed for collective perjury against pedophiles, a sign of sexual abuse. YOU SHALL BE DAMNED SILENT BY MY SHARE OF INFORMATION. Go KYS, you prejudicial scum, preying on teenage boys and girls with autism who haven't grown up. Heartless...This conversation is OVER. You're going down. You're getting arrested, because nobody talks that way about my condition unless they have something to hide.

Then, I keep my promise (or at least try to), block the conversation, and share the screenshots on my page. Going back to the conversation unprovoked makes me the abuser instead. At that point, I can't press harassment charges, but if they attack after the conversation ends, that attack is harassment, and so is everything before it. However, I don't press charges until the very end. The police have other things to deal with besides a horn fight on the Internet. I threaten because, at that time, I have the will to, and if things keep up, it would have no choice but to get the authorities involved.

That's how I judge adults, with ALL of them being guilty, collectively individually, of orchestrating our child abuse epidemic through lack of personal responsibility and parent/adult entitlement.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

The word "no": Why children need to hear the word "no" seldom (meaning almost never)

Many parents think that children need to hear the word "no" frequent and often. This is a common attitude on the part of American ...