Tuesday, February 23, 2021

"Pedophile" trauma vs. victimizing narcissism

 What is "pedophile" trauma? The need to identify as a pedophile for traumatic reasons, and usually perceive everyone as a potential abuser. The concept of a victimizing narcissism is often conflated with pedophilia, whereas a victimizing narcissist does not have valid trauma, whereas pedophiles do. Victimizing narcissists often mimic pedophiles, part of their diet as an abuser in terms of victims. They are alarmists, and tend to be authoritarian conservative "Christian" zealots and bigots, and they point to one small group of people, and say they are "everywhere" and "out to get your kids". I have "pedophile" trauma, in the affirmative, interweaved with my anti-spanking advocacy.

What does a victimizing narcissist? Everyone is the abuser to THEM, meaning everyone is out to get them. As for me, I don't think everyone is out to get me, and count presumably everyone in this community as an ally in the fight for children's rights. I think everyone, myself included, means harm to the child, but presume innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. This is different than victimizing narcissism because I don't want children abused. I just see them as possibly having my experiences as a child, and wanting to be there for them, and then I find her attractive. Yes, the daughter. Then I really want to punch out the parents - only the law won't let me punch those spoogs out the way I want to, because its still legal. Pro-social victimization is a positive trait of my pedophile, as well as pro-social promote. Manufactured traits, however, coming from hard work behind the scenes, in therapy, being unafraid to be open and honest about my mental illness.

My parent anger may appear as victimizing narcissism because, if it were left to run wild, it would assume you were lying about not spanking your child, if I were to meet you and not know who you were or what you looked like. It would assume that any parent who claimed to not punish a child was lying, and so I'd grill them hoping for the truth, but looking for lies, until there are none - then I have to facture that anti-spanking image with the parent, in the case that they don't fit the educated, suburban stereotype. I now presume innocence, so this is much easier, but my grandfather is anti-spanking. I believe him, I just don't believe it. "It" meaning the parent - who chose not to spank. Whenever someone changes like that out of nowhere, I think they are buttering me up. That's due to the fact that I am anti-spanking to the core. Yes, it's that bad.

A victimizing narcissist will victimize children much like I do, but take it up a notch, and they don't want the child to ever be safe, because when children are safe, there's nothing to worry about for them. The fact that I can put it this way shows that ALL childhood trauma is victimizing in nature, whereas only sexual trauma is allowed to be visible. All others are repressed by adult tyranny.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Righteous co-sleeping: Why God wants parents to sleep next to their children

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice for a parent to make. This is a common attitude from American parents. Most ...