Thursday, January 21, 2021

The second half of the life of my grandfather, Eugene Wisniewski

 "the second half of his life doesn't even matter..."

Yep, it does. Law school, then lawyer, then judge. He retired after being an administrative law judge for the Social Security Administration...I actually on SSI due to the profound nature of my autism (Blake: "freeze him up").

Nope, I'll live. Just a little tingle. "This is war" ("rape war" - presumably an empty threat, but all threats taken seriously, meaning the opposite if they are ridiculous, meaning null either way).

Leave him alone! Many members of my family don't mean well. He is not one of them. I do presume innocence in all individuals, including family members, but I disown anyone who misuse a children's rights trauma. I do care about the trauma, except that I work for the other side - but if you justify abuse of any kind, goodbye. That's the problem - several people, namely my Aunt Deb and Uncle Ed, and my Aunt Karen, have pro-abuse views.

People in this movement are afraid of something "BIG" that will never happen, and then are getting advice from the devil in the process.

I request anti-CR to be off the case. I don't think they have the best interests of survivors in mind. I promise not to attack survivors at all on their pages, and avoid their pages except maybe for "honest" helpful, productive discourse.

You are in a cult, guys, over a believable lie that ultimately frightens you. I don't even know what people are talking about when they are calling for an oncoming attack. I am simply a little guy behind a computer screen, with a moderate form of autism, living with my mom on SSI because I'm a loser without a job - yes, Erin, the Max you know, but you decide...They know all this about me, and want to fetishize my autism and make me appear BIG and BAD, and because I am a pedophile, they can easily get away with it. To me, as an advocate, pedophilia in a teen or young adult makes them more likely to be a victim of crime. When they say "not your purview", they are speaking over me royally - *I* decide that, not them, and trauma-informed resources have long been a lifeline for me. My mother has that background, and you bet I respect that about her. The fights you see are footage taken out of context - grooming fights, blown up to be something more. Usually, I am quiet, or as what might be documented in the car, having productive conversation.

When they say "you weren't supposed to see that" and then gaslighting you afterwards, you are in a cult. I can't yank you out of that trap. Only you can. I can leave breadcrumbs, but that's it. YOU have to do the work. You're dealing with the devil. I don't trust them, at all.

High mound. Judgment. Those are the kind of people anti-CR people are. I myself might be high-standing like they are, but in a more humble way. I might be judgmental, but only away from someone, until the last day...when we know what they did, what sins they are engaging in, that they are abusing their child, and then we flame them out. Block. Save. Rebuke.

"I WANT TO HELP!" jumping up and down. I don't want out. I want to stay and not hurt anyone here, "then we can't help you". Thank-you. (notice the dash - that one is really happening, and is ongoing). 

We don't you guys here, at all, for seeking advice from a grooming source. My therapist is supportive at the highest level, and that's what I identify her and everyone by until they disclose otherwise freely (without being quacked). "F*cking shut up". I judge in an anti-bias manner ("kicking someone because they are down, and shaking them of spare change"...and she distracted me with pointless argument about irrelevant, "YOU'RE DEAD!" is her response "I JUST WANTED TO TORMENT..."). Yep, and none of this will go in your inbox or on your page, okay. You have the right to press criminal charges in the case I attack you in that realm or fashion.

I judge the families of everyone here without bias, presuming innocence beyond a reasonable doubt, taking victim testimony going blindly backwards ("true until proven false, with true intent") and abuser testimony going the other direction ("false until proven true, doubting the abuser every step of the way"), based solely on the facts. I might have off-hand observations and opinions about your family, but unless the facts match up, I have no right to count anything I see as official evidence. I am to have no personal opinion about what I am seeing, even if I do...Get your act together, everyone. Quit assuming things about my family based on your own biases, and listen to mine.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

The word "no": Why children need to hear the word "no" seldom (meaning almost never)

Many parents think that children need to hear the word "no" frequent and often. This is a common attitude on the part of American ...