Note my stance on religious abuse under my Christian faith and tenets:
It says in Exodus 20:17 KJV:
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.
The Hebrew word translated לחמוד (Latin: lachmod) and refers to wanting something to the point of seeking to impose said item on another person, with "item" referring to religion or religious dogma.
The Greek root word repeating the Tenth Commandment, thus denoting the concept of entitlement, is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to the entitled attitude of "I am the parent, and my child is my chattel, and my child must believe like I do". Many infiltrators from organized pedophile organizations treated this community the same way.
Biblical enforcement of moral laws in relation to anti-entitlement is based on the concept of gaslighting, with said concept being almost entirely in conformity with trauma rules, with very few, if any, discrepancies. The anti-entitlement system deals with demands, and which adult in such a conversation is entitled and which one is not entitled, thus not guilty. The person who is imposing their will or their ideas on another is guilty of entitlement. The child is never guilty of entitlement, whereas the parent/adult always is.
If you don't enforce your standards of religion/irreligion you have for me, meaning hatred for my religious beliefs, I won't enforce my religious beliefs on you. My Christian beliefs are dormant in nature, in exemplary format, or else in the form of a jurisdictional peacekeeper (pro-social sequester, in self-applied format). It is none of my business what you believe in relation to me, especially if you are a child (children are exempt)...I can invite you to my church, but if you don't want to believe, what use is constant proselytization.
Just because a pro-spank doctor says I'm going to Hell for being the defiled anti-spanker that I am doesn't phase me at all. Fortune cookie, maybe? "Defiled" fits, even though it isn't literal. On other religious ideas, yes, I would take the advice of that side of things seriously. But parenting? No.
I will not shed my beliefs. Neither will you shed yours, as I cannot make you. Coexist. Libertarian conservative.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.