Saturday, January 30, 2021

ANNOUNCEMENT: Gaslighting requests for changes of wordage

 The gaslighting system here at children's rights is not the correct way to each me in the event that you find at least some of my writing to be abusive. Please do not "steer" me into your ideal of an advocate, based on your "plan for Max". I wouldn't approach a child by having a "plan" for them. I want children to feel safe.

Please speak to me in person in writing <scheibner.maxwell[at]protonmail[dot]com>. 

The tape is inaccurate, in terms of depiction, because my main way of dealing with pedophile stigma is "welcome" gaslighting, meaning reassuring calmly and compassionately, but then walking away when someone clearly does not want to be reassured. Most would just move on, just as I would. Complete jerk, thinking they are the only one in the exchange with trauma. 

For written forensic evidence? Yes, use the tape. To say "I don't like what you wrote. Please change it?" That's kind of nosy. The non-nosy thing you can do is click to the next page. Am I making any graven or death threats? Am I defaming a child by her perception or possible perception, meaning one or more individual children? If not, if it offends you, don't read it, or else read around it...Stop pushing your self-esteem crap on me. 

Please stop using forceful language over the airwaves on my platform. I am startled by such pushy and demonstrative behavior. Closes ears. Din. Counterwill. Just talk to me about these things.

To be clear, an actual survivor would not want their abuser to be guilty, but is convinced that he/she is, and so the survivor uses "guess" judgment to clarify whether an abuser is guilty, in a way that if you are not guilty, you will easily be able to answer to the court. I myself judge the same way, even with personal slights. I either brush their insults off, or else clarify for well-meaning intent, and only rebuke them at the end, when I am certain, beyond a reasonable doubt, that they are guilty and defend it as a "right". Anyone with trauma who cannot be swayed with empathy towards their trauma, even while being known to them as a pedophile, is an abuser of pedophiles. Most trauma survivors do not hate pedophiles, but simply hate abuse. Survivors do NOT want pedophiles to be guilty, but at the same time have seen too many individuals with the condition who were guilty to be so optimistic. Most pedophiles are non-offending, and avoid children's rights communities because that brings them close to a fear of children being harmed, which is a common phobia conflated with pedophilia (a bystander phobia).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Righteous co-sleeping: Why God wants parents to sleep next to their children

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice for a parent to make. This is a common attitude from American parents. Most ...