Monday, May 15, 2023

Children self-protect, adults abstain: How children profile for abusers

Many parents think they are the ones good at protecting children. The accepted notion in our society is that parents are the only people who can protect a child from a dangerous situation, such as a child predator. We stereotype children as a minority as helpless and in need of immediate help. The fact of the matter is that children self-protect, meaning children have the right to protect themselves, including from their own parents. It is instead the duty of parents and other adults to abstain from all child abuse through righteous avoidance.

As adults, we have a moral duty not to abuse a child in any way. The Bible speaks volumes about the right of children not to be abused. See Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with kidnapping being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as quartered slaves. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

The abovementioned passage in the Bible is there as a warning to all parents, not just fathers, with the Apostle Paul simply addressing fathers since it was the fathers who were abusing their children in the Early Church, and even then, few and far in between. Adults should abstain from child abuse by way of righteous avoidance. Usually, this can be summed up to avoiding anything that would offend your child, and when you have to say "no", be reassuring about it using sustaining warmth. Most fathers have parent attraction, usually towards their daughters. The key is to look into your daughter's room, look for ways you as a parent are capable of child sexual abuse, then reel back and avoid situations where your parent attractions might erupt. Righteous masturbation is an acronym related to righteous avoidance, and the two go hand in hand. The more you masturbate to sexual fantasies of your daughter, the more you feel comfortable being attracted to her, and that is because your mind has encapsulated your sex drive towards her. The more it is repressed, the greater the risk that it might come out sideways onto a child victim. Parent anger is another form of parental entitlement, and this problem can be solved by an attitude adjustment, where parents are convicted of the fact that they are depraved and entitled sinners deserving of absolutely nothing, including nothing from their children. Parent anger comes from a deserving attitude in parents, usually linked to the attitude that "I am a good person/parent". That "good person" attitude can lead to parents feeling deserving of things, including from their children, and then feeling miserable when they don't get what they want from their children. Personal responsibility is key to child abuse prevention.

Children can profile for abusers of all types, but especially adults who rape or sexually assault children. Children in biblical times were completely sexually aware, and used their sexuality to judge for child rapists and sexual assailants. Children gauged the entitlement in an adult, and if the adult pedophile was safe around children, the children were attracted to the pedophile, usually in an objectifying way that the pedophile didn't mind - think like the town mascot role. If any adult was sexually unsafe, children's sexualities caused them to repel from the adult in question. Mothers were paying close attention to how their children were reacting to adults, and making protective decisions based on how the child profiled other adults. 

I myself am a pedophile. I use righteous avoidance and righteous masturbation in order to center my entitlement in relation to children. I avoid children, and under amendments to my Christian faith, I am not allowed to speak to children except with their consent, and even then, their mother has the right to overrule them if she thinks I am not safe to talk to them. I have to masturbate in order to center my sexual entitlement towards children. In the past, I was an antisocial flirt towards children. As a pedophilic adult who has sexually offended a child, I am a depraved and decadent sinner who is deserving of nothing but DEATH and PUNISHMENT merely for existing in relation to children. We all as adults are guilty merely for existing in relation to children and the God that protects them. I am deserving of absolutely nothing from a child, and am grateful for all of the forgiveness my child victims afford me, as I am deserving of none of it.

The depraved and decadent adults who provoke children to anger through child abuse will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Righteous co-sleeping: Why God wants parents to sleep next to their children

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice for a parent to make. This is a common attitude from American parents. Most ...