Wednesday, December 21, 2022

Anti-parent: Understanding the anti-parent system

Many people are suspicious of anything labeled "anti-parent". This is an anti-parent/adult page, meaning we hate parents on this page, meaning all who identify as such. It is a myth that only child predators support anti-parent methods. The fact of the matter is that anti-parent is a branch of the anti-entitlement system that deals with parents, and by extension, all adults. Pedophiles are no longer seen by the children's rights movement as a guaranteed threat to children, as a pedophile (meaning I) has surrendered himself to children's rights study, and the results show that child sexual abuse in particular has little to do with pedophiles.

The anti-entitlement system is based on the whole Bible and is the method that a Christian society enforces moral laws with. Anti-parent targets entitled parents with righteous judgment. Entitlement, as a concept, comes from the Tenth Commandment. It says in Exodus 20:17 KJV:

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.

The Greek root word translated "covet" is לחמוד (Latin: lachmod) and refers not to simply wanting the person, property, or effects of your neighbor. Coveting is wanting things from your neighbor, to the point of imposition, and it only counts as coveting when the entitlement is defended in court. This commandment is defended in the New Testament by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to entitlement, meaning, officially speaking, want, to the point of imposition. 

Parental entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. Unofficially speaking, parental entitlement refers to wanting things from children, period. Parental entitlement technically legally is not a moral crime, in and of itself, unless it leads to a defense in open court. The defense I, as an anti-parent specialist, am looking for is any use of the words "parent" or "adult" in first-person defensive format.

There is no reason why you have to assert yourself as "the parent" or "the adult". We know you are a parent by the fact that you have a child in tow. We know you are an adult because you tower over children. If you need to clarify your age, state the exact number age you are, as that is more credible in a court of law than just "I am an adult". These two words should be third-person words. Even child sexual predators will defend themselves on the surface by the parent-label or the adult-label. Whenever you hear a parent talk about themselves in first-person, be suspicious, and count their words, because you could be talking to a viper.

What can a parent or adult identify as? Try identifying by a trauma or other mental illness that hampers your duties towards children as a parent/adult. I identify as a pedophile in order to clarify that I am working on my parental entitlement issues. If you fit any mental health label, or are labeled as having any form of mental illness, identify by it, and I will believe you. Same with addictions. An entitled parent will deny having any of these conditions, and will think that their children have something wrong with them instead. I myself identify as a pedophile, in order to show that maybe I do, in fact, mean well in relation to children, as who would admit to something like that if they wanted to look good? Under my Christian standards, I have to be honest when questioned as to if I am a pedophile, particularly in relation to a potential child victim.

Parents don't need to talk about themselves at all in first-person. It says in Matthew 6:4 KJV:

That thy alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly.

Parents should NOT put their best foot forward. The doctrine of family honesty in the Early Church was pro-social evil, meaning family discussion frequently turned repentant in relation to children, with parents atoning for their sins in relation to children. In short, parents did not talk about all the good things they did for their children. They gave in secret to their children, claiming at the same time to be depraved and decadent sinners deserving of absolutely nothing in relation to their children, or from anyone else. I myself am a depraved and decadent sinner/adult who is deserving of absolutely nothing, from children or anyone else.  When parents didn't get the chance to repent in their speech concerning their children, they remained silent and shamefaced, fearing the Lord in their children. Silence is a badge of shame that all human beings are deserving of, and which most human beings are unwilling to wear due to pride.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Righteous co-sleeping: Why God wants parents to sleep next to their children

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice for a parent to make. This is a common attitude from American parents. Most ...