What is anti-parent profiling?

Many people in this country see parents as the solution for all child abuse. Most adults do not understand that parents are a primary cause for childhood in terms of existence, meaning do not exist once identifying as a parent, as we will find you and we will catch you, once we have the laws to do so.

Anti-parent profiling surrounds the word "parent", meaning the use of the word "parent" in first-person as a glorified title, much like royalty. Nobody has the right to identify as a parent, as being a parent is not a right. Child custody is not a constitutional right, and should never be made a constitutional right. 

What types of parents are there, in terms of boxes to check. See 1 Corinthians 5:11 KJV:

But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.

The central category here is the one underlined, which is the Greek root word translated "covetous", which is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to parental entitlement, or wanting things from children to the point of imposition, leading to an offense. Offenses are not mentioned here as theft, and that is because theft requires entitlement to exist as a moral crime, meaning entitlement is the necessary burden of proof for the plaintiff in terms of proving an offense. Just offending someone accidentally is not theft, but offending somebody out of an imposed want is an offense, and that includes with children. You can't just be offended over everything from everyone, as most of the time, it is an accident, thus not a counted offense under divine law.

Offenses against children, or child abuse, as an epidemic, is due to parental entitlement. From there, all other profiles of parent pan out, with significant overlap in these profiles. Any of these attitudes enumerated here can lead to an offense, in which case the entitlement was part of the crime. The moment one is entitled towards a child, it is as if they have committed the act already, even if they, in fact, didn't.

In order to judge a parent, one must presume innocence beyond a reasonable doubt in terms of entitlement leading to theft, as an arm's length statement, in tick-tock format. The line of judgment resembles a hump cast on its side, with the steeper end of the hill being when an individual found guilty is sent downhill, thus proving innocence from there on is an uphill battle, but can be done with adequate evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that they are innocent. Wait until the last day before casting the parent away, gauging for entitlement leading to theft towards a child, viewing parents as a reverse window, usually nodding and avoiding the entitled parent. The moment they use the word "parent" in their defense, condemn them, if not for entitlement alone. The key to coming to a conviction of child abuse in a parent is a list of excuses, meaning make excuses for the parent you suspect, until you can make no more.

Once you have convicted the parent, cast them away, and do not speak to them or engage in fanfare with them, avoiding them at all costs, whenever possible. The idea is, when the moral crime is serious, warn others of the parent in question, and campaign against the parent, until the parent is completely cornered, and not allowed to exist anywhere within the United States! What could they have done better? NOT identify as a parent to justify abuse! 

Let the shunned parents burn! We hate you, we hate you, we hate you, if you provoke your child to anger in any way (Col. 3:21). We hate your pro-spanking views especially that you hold onto! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!