Why not to force affection on children this Thanksgiving

It is that time of the year again, meaning Thanksgiving and then Christmas. I am one to eschew the politically correct phrase "holidays". I am that kind of adult, meaning I am old school, but in the attachment parenting type of way. I wouldn't force any child to hug me, staying steadfast even as the parents pressured the child to hug me.

The Greek root word denoting entitlement in the New Testament is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers here to wanting a child to hug an adult to the point of seeking to impose said want onto the child, forming unlawful intent towards a child, leading to offense when said offense is perceived by the child, meaning child abuse, meaning a moral crime, meaning sin. It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and more literally translates to "trust", meaning warm, sustaining trust in parents, with this trust coming from freedoms and civil liberties handed to children by parents, including the right not to be touched by an adult without their consent. This command is written aside to parents mainly, with forcing a child to show affection to an adult shattering trust with adults. This was considered battery under the Law, with the Greek root word for all offenses in the Bible, translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to "stirring up" children, as in "stirring the pot" concerning their emotional welfare. This refers to provocations to anger inflicted upon children, meaning offenses against children, defined as the slightest of personal slight stemming from entitlement, including that which stems from touch entitlement from parents, meaning any and every way a child lawfully and justly rejects being touched by an adult.

I myself am a pedophile, and might enjoy a nice hug from a young girl, but she has the right to say "shake hands" instead, and then I think she is very smart and intuitive for doing so, so I just accept it and don't complain. Usually, children would refuse a hug because the adult in question is a pedophile, and may have a sexual attraction that fetishizes tactile stimulation next to a child's body. Children usually pick up on the vibes, and say, in so many words with their refusal, "nope, I know what you are thinking", and children just know intuitively, even when they don't factually. Apart from the adult being a pedophile, many children who experience or have experienced sexual abuse do not like being touched. It should be commonsense that a child doesn't have to touch someone they don't want to touch, as that is the legal understanding of battery, under both the English common law (for adults only, currently, sadly) and under Divine Law. The slightest of touch without consent is, in fact, an offense under biblical law, meaning theft under the Eighth Commandment, and thus entitlement under the Tenth Commandment.

Let the depraved child batterers who violate a child's consent be condemned to eternal Hell-fire, suffering in the torrents of the second death, prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!