Understanding lawful sexual abuse - from a regret adult's perspective

I have offended a child, and the law excuses it. Even if I appreciate being excused, I don't. What is lawful sexual abuse? It is sexual abuse at the lawful level, and likely makes up the majority of sexual abuse incidents in this country, where 90% of incidents go unreported.

What does the word "lawful" mean here? A certain level, within plain sight, starting at leering and including flirting behaviors. It is entitlement in the sense that the adult wants something from the child, and seeks to impose that want on a child. When a child perceives sexual advances from an adult, that is sexual abuse. Most sexual abuse exists on the lawful level, most likely. Most victims of child sexual abuse are not victims of pedophilic adults, but by adults with a secondary attraction to children, usually men attracted to teenage girls, where they choose to be in a place and time where an offense can occur, not defending children from their own adult sexual entitlement, rendering them an adult fornicator and sexual abuser, defiling themselves next to children. Much of the time, it does not get beyond antisocial "rough-play", or rough-housing with the wrong sexual hopes and entitlement. These offenses cannot be easily charged under most jurisdictions, and usually, the victim simply wants separation from the abuser, and wants the abuse to stop, which should be stopped as carefully and as discreetly as possible and wanted by the victim. Here in Pennsylvania, lawful sexual abusers are not dealt with by the anti-child abuse system, but by patrol officers called to the scene of a dispute, usually between two parents, and usually the perpetrator has a mental disability of some sort, and didn't know. 

Usually, though, the abusers of this type refuse to learn. I myself did "take the bait" so to speak, from a therapist, but in a good way, meaning it felt like biting into the cold hard truth - she wasn't into me. Narcissistic offenders often do not believe in what they are doing, and want out at some level, even if they can't leave. A lawful sexual abuser is a sex-positive offender, in tone-deaf format, meaning they don't internalize society's norms involving how to treat children with respect.

There is no clear rules in the United States as to what respect a child needs apart from the Bible, and the Bible teaches that children deserve to be respected first, then children respect their parents. I myself hold strict religious beliefs in favor of children's rights as a Christian, and apply it to myself as reformatory theology. I was once a leftist, and a toxic one, and I pointed the finger at everyone else in terms of child abuse, creating a scary world. Conservative Christianity prompts me to presume innocence in my neighbor, and convict myself first, then others. The moment I look at a child with intent to approach them, I have approached them already in the eyes of God.

Lawful means obvious, but usually in a politically correct context. Usually, the abuser is leftist. Usually, the leftist is an autism self-advocate of some sort. Usually, they are sheltered and protected due to their autism, with the pedophilia they may have as a disorder excused as a part of their mental disability. They aren't hidden as much as enabled by society. They don't have a peacekeeper, hence why we call the abuse lawful, even though it is unlawful - the level that it is on. It doesn't have to be a peacekeeper to be taken seriously as a threat. Question them, as that is their weakness - they can't answer the questions if they are guilty. A concerned parent alone can take on this piece of pathetic scum. They usually cannot lie meaning deceive by commission about their offenses, but may be keen at hiding by omission, and honesty is like opening up floodgates, for good or for bad.

The silver lining in this is that children today are more street smart and less submissive than they were a few decades ago, meaning most abuse, at the most regressive of behavior, is antisocial "rough-play", meaning a pedophile rough-housing with a child victim for the wrong reasons. In the past, rape was more often in the context of rough-play, or else indecent assault of a child, but these days, the predatory pedophiles are simply rough-housing with child victims, hoping to get somewhere, getting nowhere but kicked or shoved away. 

I myself am being investigated basically for a case of antisocial "rough-play" with a younger female family member. The police blew it up into a religious sexual abuse story, when the actual abuse involved rough-play that went way out of bounds, meaning abuse by the child victim's perceptions. Anything that makes a child uncomfortable is child abuse, including any sexual perception whatsoever from adult advances. What the police could have done would have been handing me a fine once reported by my cousin's father, and then I take responsibility from there. The parents made a report that lead to a warning in my file in the case I harassed again by her perspective, which I didn't...The police wanted to corrupt the situation and make it worse. But, what I did alone was bad. The police didn't have to dress it up by making up a grooming story, attempting to pit me against my cousin.  

The depraved and decadent, defiled adult fornicators who use their pedophilic disorder to impose sexual entitlement on children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!