Education about sexuality: Educating children in a purity-based environment without shame or punishment

Many people here in the children's rights community wonder if I would sexually shame a daughter. I am a pedophile, so the answer is "yes, maybe" depending on how long or hard I looked when she stepped out of the shower, which I am not ashamed of my gaze.

Should children even be having sex? No, but punishing it is sin as well, as punishment is for adults who know what they are doing, whereas children and teens are too impulsive to be held to any standard. The Greek root word denoting parental entitlement is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to wanting a child to be chaste (a good wish for any child), but to the point of seeking to impose chastity standards onto a child, instead of modeling them. It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers, in a sex education context, to open discussion between parent and children that are developmentally appropriate, and not sexually hateful or objectifying to the child. Talking about sex with your child is not impurity, but making sexually hateful or objectifying remarks that shame their body or their sexual preferences is a form of sexual impurity and fornication. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers here to not punishing your child for mere sexual thoughts or even behaviors, including masturbation. The Apostle Paul meant the command to fathers in vs. 21 as a command against physical or other means of punishment or control.

The idea is to allow space for children to ask questions about perhaps their body changing, and the mechanics of sexuality. Usually, children only ask questions they are developmentally ready for. Sexual purity here means you actually don't want children having sex, so you inform them in a way that they won't want to, due to the risks involved. The sex-critical term for this is "risk-aware", meaning making children aware of the risks of sex, portraying it as something very special "between a husband and wife who love each other", but answer questions in a way they would understand, geared towards their developmental level.

When children do have sex? I would tell them how I felt, and leave it at that, and beyond that point, I'd accept defeat in my words to them, saying "I hate what your are doing with your life between the sheets, but I can't stop you", walking away with my head low. When I get an angry phone call about my son knocking up some girl, I'd say to him "I told you so, now buck up and own up to what you did, and pay the child support" because he could have easily just masturbated to thoughts of that girl. I believe in the teaching of the prodigal son for when teenagers have sex, meaning if you are a good example towards them, they won't want to go "all the way" with a classmate, and will have good boundaries in this regard. The Millennial generation is one of the most abstinent generations in history in terms of sexual behavior. Many sex-positive parents think they all are doing it, but they aren't. All they need is someone to talk about it with, namely a parent or other trusted adult, and they're fine. Sex can be channeled by choice just like any other drive, with the means usually being solitary. Just put the porn blocker on the computer when warranted, and you're good. The kids that have sex these days don't have a parent to talk to about how they feel about a boy or girl, so they just do it behind the scenes.

The depraved and entitled parents who sexually shame and objectify children with their visible attitudes will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn and descend into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death, which is Satan's final resting place! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!