Another interview...

Why do you think I am posting pornography? "It's just filth" How so? "It's just hateful stuff, a mother and her baby in a sexual scene" I know what scene you are talking about. In certain cultures, including the one referenced, nudity could be separated from sexuality, and thus, you appear the pervert projecting onto someone else, even if you are in fact making a simple mistake in reading my work, which I don't believe at this point. I really do think you are projecting for your crimes in the pool-yard. "Do not go below the legal age" It's all rape to me. Filth. Disgusting. And you are worried about a mother and child in an ancient context? How dare you pull this!

I post certain things in order to get the perverts to stick their foot in their mouths, meaning nudity is not the same as sex, and if you mix the two in that context, *I*, even as a pedophile, am alarmed. 

On the lowest level, I did test as sexualizing attachment parenting, which is not a good thing. It is a flaw of mine as a symbolic parent towards children. We go by the highest level in any victim here at children's rights, not the lowest, unless they identify by the lowest level. I think it is a flaw, meaning a pathological disorder and sin nature. I can attach sexual meaning to attachment parenting, as long as any sexual desires aren't imposed on the child. Any sexual stimulation of a child perceived by the child is adult fornication, thus sexual abuse. A child is anyone under age 18. That's why I am suspicious of you, Markie. Not jealous - I know it is wrong - suspicious. How you treat those girls matters to me, and if they are complaining...f*ck the law, because if the law allows for sex with underage teenagers, the law needs to be changed. That's messed up.

You cannot commit a sexual offense under biblical law without having sexually offending intent, meaning any perception of pornography has to be tested against the intent of the perpetrator of pornographic harassment. I had the intent to separate nudity from sexuality, in a bold statement, which is different from masturbating while typing smut on a children's rights screen. If you have no intent to sexually gaslight your audience, meaning flip off survivors or "romance" them, then you shouldn't have anything to worry about. I am a preverbal pedophile, and a preverbal pedophile would use different, more mechanical terminology. All you'd have to do is get on their case and say "delete that crap", and if they refuse, they may not have meant it in the way you perceive it. I apologize if anyone genuinely finds my posts pornographic, as that is not my intent. 

Pornography is based on its intent, not its viewership, or else anyone could discredit anyone's work as pornography, as pansexuality is a thing. I wouldn't write out m fantasies in full lettering, when I can just abbreviate them when someone needs to know, meaning they literally are afraid of me because they need to know, because I guard such personal information. That stuff is unsafe when it gets out there on the Internet.