Why more abuse should be self-reported

Who should be called to report child abuse? Currently, here in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, it is a list. A list of mandated reporters. I went to school, and the police did come to our school to educate students in order to be street smart. That is children's rights, to a small degree, meaning you can tell that the status of children, as a whole in this country, is getting better, by the fact that children are MORE street smart than they were in previous decades or eras. Things are improving for children in the United States, but it will take time. The more children know about their safety, the safer children are.

I am self-diagnosed as a pedophile. Many adults, pedophile or non-pedophile, take it personally when a child points them out as an abuser. I don't. I get scared, and it is a reformatory fear that tells you not to cross that boundary again. Now, I don't hang out with children like I used to, meaning pro-social overstate of motives, leading to pro-social self-incrimination. I simply have a duty to protect them by staying away from them.

The proper acronyms are children self-protect and adults abstain. Both these acronyms denote to parents and other adults what children's rights is. It is, first and foremost, adults abstaining from entitlement leading to child abuse. Child abuse is defined under biblical law as anything that damages the child, meaning legal damages. It says in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to momentary legal damages, meaning the slightest of personal slights imposed by an adult onto a child, with entitled intent. A moral crime, in the Bible, has two components, guilty intent (mens rea) leading to/guided by guilty action (actus reus). Basically, whenever a child is afraid of an adult, or else feels unsafe or uncomfortable around an adult, that is abuse, unless the adult clarifies their good intent and either apologizes and/or egresses from the scene of the crime.

Children should have the right to send away their abuser, much like we afford women today who are being harassed by men. Under my purview as an adult, children have the right to disown me, and that usurps the imaginary "authority" and "rule" of their parents. Children have the right to simply tell me off when they feel unsafe, and send me away, and I don't see it as disrespect. 

It is a delicate case of mutual submission, where the child makes lawful demands of safety and rights, and the adult complies, often having duties of care and protection towards a child. If a pedophile like me can admit to entitlement, with the humility that I might have while doing so, what's your excuse, pro-spanking parents? Just knock them all down, then the law follows suit. 

Children should be the group to have pride and self-esteem, for they are only little once. Instead, adults should be the ones to feel guilty, for merely existing in relation to children. Children have the inherent right to exist, as they have done nothing wrong, even if they have as older children or adolescents, as children are exempt from Divine Prosecution due to ignorance leading to legal infancy under Divine Codified Jurisprudence. It is called pro-social surrender, meaning you surrender your authority to the constituency which is children. Children then have the First Amendment right to free speech. All that means, literally, is that the government cannot lock up children for their mere opinions, however, public schools often punish children for their opinions, and so do other adults, meaning children cannot have a say in this country without threat of abuse or retaliation from adults.

The depraved and entitled parents will BURN! Let them languish in torment! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!