Friday, June 25, 2021

Understanding adult sexual entitlement and adult fornication

 Many parents and adults have a sexual entitlement problem with their child or a child, and it is more than you would think. About 1-2% of men are pedophiles, and about 20% of men have secondary attractions to younger children. What is adult sexual entitlement/fornication? Why are thoughts not a moral crime under biblical law?

The Greek root word denoting entitlement in the New Testament is πλεονέκτης and is translated as "covetous" in many verses, including 1 Corinthians 5:11 KJV:

But I have told you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with one an no not to eat.

The fact of the matter is that all sin must be open to judge, in some way, in some form. Sin, in divine court. has an offender and a plaintiff, with the plaintiff being the offended by a certain conduct or course of conduct. Mere thought crimes cannot be considered moral crimes, since they cannot be proven in court.

Entitlement is wanting something to the point of seeking to impose said wants onto a child, leading to abuse. Fornication refers to when the sexual entitlement is perceived by the child through sensory gaslighting. 1 Corinthians 5:11 KJV:

Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body, but he who committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

The Greek root word translated "fornication" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and is the one moral crime that offends God, even if it doesn't offend its target, as God hates the misuse of sexual venom, meaning it is part of the duties of both husband and wife as a marriage. Adult sexual entitlement is sexually entitlement directed towards a child, as defended by such in one's actions or attitudes towards children, and when this entitlement is perceived by children in a way that stimulates fear and/or enjoyment, it is fornication, and if the adult doesn't apologize, they are the lowest of sinners in the lake of fire that is Hell. Simply looking, for example, is not sin, if the child doesn't notice or just brushes you off. It becomes the moral crime of antisocial "leer" when she looks back in an angry and/or frightened way. A child can claim anything that is sexually motivated from an adult as sexual abuse under Divine Codified Jurisprudence.

Simply sexual fantasy that is shared nowhere is not a moral crime. because it isn't directed towards a child, and even if it was directed towards a child, it could not be proven in court readily at that level. Lust alone is not a sin, with it saying in Colossians 3:5-6 KJV:

Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil conscupience, and covetousness, which is idolatry: For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience: In which ye walked some time, when ye lived in them.

The Greek root word translated "inordinate affections" is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and involves sexual entitlement, meaning wanting sexual relations with a child to the point of seeking it out, leading to fornication. This can be understood by rules of intent, meaning guilty intent (mens rea) leading to/guided by guilty action (actus reus). Entitlement proper is another layer, regarding chosen apology or refused apology. Basically, this would be approaching a child in a public place, asking inappropriate questions, with intent to "get somewhere", in which case the line of intent leads to proposed sexual activity, and the child should have the right to stop the situation right there, and possibly call the authorities. The Greek word mentioned refers to sexual entitlement and yearnings that can go nowhere, and are driven in nature, as opposed to simply an isolated fantasy or afterthought. It is a sexually demanding and channeled attitude towards a child, usually a sexual crush on a child that can go nowhere morally, and must be restrained at all costs.

"Inordinate affections" does not refer to pedophilia as a whole, but to when the intensity of the desires puts a child's life or welfare at risk. No sexual preference is banned under this biblical statute, but acting on pathological sexual preferences, meaning those that have no consensual outlet with another person, or are directed towards animals, is sin, and those who commit acts of sexual sin are the lowest among mankind, and the lowest in Hell, when they don't repent. Being born anyway is not a moral crime, as there is only one spiritual disease, entitlement, in which case all human beings struggle with such a spiritual affliction. Pedophilia is just one struggle of many.

The depraved and sexually entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through fornication will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let the parent/adult fornicators BURN! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Crying: Why crying is not bad behavior

Many parents think that a child who cries is being "naughty" or "bad". This s a common attitude amongst American parents...