Many pro-abuse groups are opposed to the victim/narcissist system, or else favoring narcissism. I myself favor tested victimhood, but do not operate, as an advocate, based on the victim/narcissist system, but the anti-entitlement system of judgment.
I presume innocence beyond a reasonable doubt in an adult, with presuming innocence every step of the way, then pronouncing guilt. However, it says in 1 Corinthians 5:11 KJV:
But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man who be called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner, with such an one not to eat.
The Greek root word translated "covetous" is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektes) and refers to the anti-entitlement system. You might just say the wrong thing to me, and get me upset, while usually being my friend, I may question you using the Socratic method, namely "who""what""why". My moral legal judgment is whodunnit judgment, meaning all I care about is if you did it or didn't do it, and you either did it or you didn't, for the most part. However, if you defend your actions or attitudes in favor of abuse, you become entitled, whereas if you just fess up, in tears, and atone for your actions by verbal or non-verbal actions, that is non-entitlement, as is struggling with an abuse habit and seeking help.
I judge by lamppost, meaning out in the open, in a way that is threatening to an entitled perpetrator, with the abuser feeling like the judgment is out to get them. I give them every opportunity to apologize and maybe either make amends or the abuser takes advantage of my kindness, then I cast them away, out of existence, meaning out of my sight, except when I want to be reminded of them.
I go by the anti-entitlement system when judging system, meaning narcissists and pedophiles are irrelevant since they can exist on both sides of the entitlement table. Did you do it? Doesn't matter if I like you or not, if you abuse a child, I am to have nothing to do with you as a children's rights Christian/conservative.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.