Why children's equality already exists in America - examining the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

 Many people do not believe children can have equal rights. Say it the wrong way and people think you are a pedophile - so I just admit it to gaslight the abusers (works every time). However, children's rights is an American idea, and originated on her soil. The Fourteenth Amendment grants children equal rights to adults, to the degree that they can accept the responsibility, based on their developmental level.

AMENDMENT XIV Section 1

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the citizens whereof they reside. No state shall make or enforce any laws which shall abridge or immunities of the United States; nor shall any state deprive a person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny anybody the equal protection of the laws.

"Equal protection of the laws" refers to equal justice for battery under the law. Battery is the slightest of touch without consent, under the English common law. Battery is a criminal act that is protected in the case of a parent "within reason" disciplining their child. Assault is not, with assault meaning any documented injuries from a child being battered by parents. Here in Pennsylvania, battery is decriminalized, meaning a form of either harassment or disorderly conduct, depending on the venue, location, and convenience for law enforcement agents (LEAs) in terms of court mandate. Assault of a child is seen as "endangering the welfare of children" (18 Pa.C.S. §4303).

Not only does children's civil liberties exist in the law of men, but also in God's Law, and is denoted in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translating "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and literally translates to "stir up" or "upbraid" and refers to momentary damages, such as pain, shame, emotional distress, defamation of character, loss of possessions/tokens, and/or fornication. The Greek root word denoting fornication towards a child is πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refers to the age of consent, as does 1 Corinthians 7:36 KJV:

But if any man think that he behaveth uncomely toward his virgin, if she pass the flower of his age, and need so require, let him do what he will: let them marry.

"Man" here refers not to any suitor or husband, but to her father. The Greek root word translated "flower of her age" is ύπερακμός (Latin: huperakmos) and explicitly refers to the age of consent, whereas other age limits, including even the age of infancy, are implied by the pull-up word κρινο (Latin: krinó) and refers to all procedures of legal judgment under the Mosaic Law. The age of consent was conflated with the age of majority. Today, the age of majority in most U.S. states is 18, as should the age of consent be here in Pennsylvania, where it is unfortunately 16, with the law rendering some girls in particular at risk of forced marriage.

All these children's rights values were transported by God from Israel to the Westernized world by the Bible, which is the most powerful legal document in all of human history, meaning most read, and also most burned. Children's rights is a biblical concept, therefore American as apple pie. Why don't we buy into it. Political correctness from the purity police, with me speaking as a Christian who endorses tenets of sexual purity. The difference for the children's rights Christian/conservative is that one focuses on purity in oneself, and adults in relation to children, while allowing freedom for the child to do what she will, dress as she will, and so forth.

The depraved and entitled parents will burn and languish in the lake of fire and brimstone, suffering the second death! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!