What is happening (and why Robbyn is being singled out by righteous judgment)

 Currently, anti-children's rights is trying to create a co-victim situation between me and Robbyn, and it remains classified as a co-victim dispute, and I do not take ownership to any further attack, which was made out of mental frailty imposed by anti-children's rights.

Beyond this point, Robbyn, if you do not admit to your end of the co-victim bargain, you become an abuser and me the victim. You have a personality that makes it hard for you to admit that you make mistakes, but you don't go to Hell for mistakes in my religious view, but defending them as a right.

Ethan wanted me to take you out, and I will never let that happen, but anti-CR gaslighting is like a high that distorts moral legal reality to me. I am, under my faith values, not responsible for anything done under gaslighting unless I defend them as a "right", but I do feel sorry for you that you are being targeted through me.

When you see me attack assuming you are grooming me, don't take it too seriously, and remind me of the situation. Thank you in advance for cooperating.

I dropped the charges because the story was supposed to go that, of course, a pedophile would want a survivor to go to jail, meaning the "head honcho of dirty women". Nope, this one respects what you do, but more so on the spanking issue. I respect your past academic curiosity about pedophilia, particularly victim pedophiles. Those are the pedophiles I stand up for, and I myself am a tested victim.

What happens is that Robbyn starts with a friendly conversation, like I would expect with someone of her expertise, but then the altar is voiced over and she turns on me, which is a good way to get me very angry. My mother never turns on me like that, and neither would I deal with a child like that. Anti-children's rights assumes I am a narcissist, and they want there to be one "beneath his skin". Usually, we say "behind his facade" about that issue. Do you understand how threatening that is to me, who has become a profiling autistic due to the gaslighting. Am I going nuts? I don't think I am at all, and even then, "nuts" isn't a sin in and of itself (including pedophilia).

The kind of conversation about pedophiles that I want with survivors is based on mental health awareness. It is actually against my religious views to stigmatize someone's mental illness willingly, even a pedophile's. That's why I never call abusers "pedophiles". We aren't an abuser, in a way which is relevant. We are a victim/abuser, and society should focus on the victim in a preventative manner in relation to preventing child abuse. I think you would agree with me. I know what you are trying to prove about me in the end, and I think you should state such a thing in the beginning, and see how much agreement you'll get. I polled a lot of survivors in the victim tape, and they all came to agreement with me, or at least the bulk of them that were women. We keep fighting because that hidden agreement isn't known...For outsiders, it is seen not as something good, but as something tragic for someone like me. Admitting privilege over pedophiles is a two-sided issue, where the pedophile themselves must learn to be comfortable in their own skin (that type of self-acceptance) whereas, ideally, family and friends would know, and would feel sad about such an unfortunate condition, in an empathetic, listening way that is remote - they see you as a person first. Most people here are like that. I saw that in ETC. The religion issue was seen as separate then, due to the reformatory nature in which I approach the Bible...Nobody in my family cried about a pedophile for a reason - too low level of an issue, even for that kind of mourning. It is silent mourning, and it can make people turn anti-spanking like me, I have found. It is a topic where people quickly respond like a sounding board, and then you are simply you to them. My guess is that some pedophiles are more articulate than others, and if you have a children's rights lexicon, you can get very far with people, but only if you mean well.

Robbyn, you were classified as a parent. There are known parents and unknown yet identified parents here. Foursquare itself is an identified parent in collective format. Anyone who means me control in a certain fashion is a parent. Certain websites set up their rules, and I am subject to them, but controlling someone like a spinning top, for selfish reasons, is abuse. No employer is that controlling unless THEY are abusive. Most of what we call "control" is really consequences for actions. I chose to file that job application, and that's why I have a nasty boss that I can't stand. Wait it out, or get another job. Either way, you have choices. I see things in a choice based way, and when someone is being abusive, I am allowed to impose choice theory on people, perhaps as a righteous test. I want people to choose to respect me, meaning fake respect is kind of annoying. You don't need to be overly sensitive to "that thing". It is something you listen to, usually in terms of a burdensome crush that you know won't go anywhere, and NOT step in with advice. Pedophiles need to find out their own problems, and if they refuse to, they consent to the consequences of their actions, and sadly so do children.