Tuesday, April 27, 2021

Stephanie Cox is not on my watch list

 No, you are not. You seem to be worried about victim disclosures accusing a spousal abuser with autism, who confined you to an unlawful marriage, meaning a child marriage only allowed by secular laws.

You have done nothing wrong, and I am sad to know you have left the reader base for my page. I am relieved, in fact, to know you don't support abusers with autism, so I know you won't make excuses for me. We disagree in that I think they should be healthy aware of their condition, meaning a centered awareness. That's how I am.

You were lied to. That is not your fault, but the person spreading the lies.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Back talk: Why back talk is not deserving of punishment

Many parent have to deal with it. Most children talk back to their parents at some point during their childhood. This is normal childhood be...