Tuesday, April 27, 2021

Stephanie Cox is not on my watch list

 No, you are not. You seem to be worried about victim disclosures accusing a spousal abuser with autism, who confined you to an unlawful marriage, meaning a child marriage only allowed by secular laws.

You have done nothing wrong, and I am sad to know you have left the reader base for my page. I am relieved, in fact, to know you don't support abusers with autism, so I know you won't make excuses for me. We disagree in that I think they should be healthy aware of their condition, meaning a centered awareness. That's how I am.

You were lied to. That is not your fault, but the person spreading the lies.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Time-in: Why mammary closeness is the biblical way of doing time-in

Many parents think that punishment is an acceptable thing for parents to do to their children. Most child abuse comes in the form of time-ou...