Many who have come here have made false promises that have been damaging, and some true ones as well. How about no real promises at all, and instead my page as examined in a reflective manner alongside a societal canvas of progress, since no man is an island.
I am not the leading page here, but one page here. I am an influential one, I believe, on the issue of non-offending pedophiles, meaning the first documented one in the children's rights database. What happened was that the whole community knew, in advance, that they were likely to get someone to switch things up, and stop abusers from being medicalized as a media excuse. How do I think I did? Pretty well, but there are societal obstacles that spread the word from traveling farther. We have yet to see definitive progress, meaning media outlets universally shunning the legal and prejudicial use of the word "pedophile" or "pedophilia", and that is due to pro-spank roadblocks, some very gaseous towards me.
As for the spanking issue, I see in the future, as a historical peacekeeper, as how things are likely going to take place, personally studying many countries where spanking and punishment of children is outlawed. In many of such countries, the welfare state, for example, is a politically heated issue, meaning certain traditionalist conservatives, whom are often Eurosceptical was well (against the European Union), may not agree with the fact that there is universal healthcare in their country. But, even in such countries, there is one united front against pro-spanking parents, who make up a small or sizeable minority in such countries.
As for further promises? None. We'll see how things pan out, as my input as an advocate goes into the pot. Eventually, the tide will turn, and I may well quietly credit myself for being part of the solution. I see it as a gradual change, best evidenced in the theological establishment, where conservative churches are now not excluding anti-spanking parents officially (though many still do unofficially).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.