I can do it. I am capable of that, due to the type of "pro-spank" conditioning necessary to heal from core-level anti-spanking trauma. Most here are anti-spanking traumatics. We at Maxwell Clark Scheibner, all in one, are anti-spanking survivors, and survivors of parental rights abuse. I'm actually not aggressive towards parents. Think cowboy hat. Think arms folded as parent demands "rights" to punish their children, carrying on at me as "entitled" and "judgmental" (all how she likely treats her child - sick people out there).
Silence is golden. A pro-spanking parent is a vulnerable abuser, in a delicious and scrumptious was when in its entitled, defenses. Laugh a little bit at them as well to belittle the pro-spanker. Slip in some insults at their non-existent rights to refuse to protect their child. How is hitting a child protection?
Pro-spanking parents go on tirades, so provoke one. Add fuel to the fire in droplets, then laugh at them for how ridiculous they are for wanting to pick on a CHILD and how they see a CHILD to be scary. Waa. Waa. Waa. They are safe people, children are. They aren't hurting me, so why are you so afraid of them. Wuss, being afraid of smaller people instead instead of bringing down evil oppressors with pro-social covert narcissism - I am one of them, in children's rights pedophile format. No, I'm not out to get your child, but YOU, and I hope one day I'm able to flip the switch and have you arrested. I want to see the parents in handcuffs, even if they aren't near me, because I had no rights as a child, so neither should they for committing domestic battery against a best friend of mine (at least in spirit, in affinity). All children are best friends to the entitled adult.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.