Apparently you wanted me to take out fellow anti-spanking advocate Robbyn Peters Bennett, and remove her from the movement, thinking you are God and can move things around with an antisocial "God" complex.
I single you out as well as Ethan because both of you are big wigs in the anti-children's rights industry. I know why you formed VirPed, and know it is for neutral reasons related to strong views in favor of keeping the age of consent where it is at. So, I respect VirPed, and always will, but do not respect the two men that founded it.
Step down! That's the only power I have over VirPed - urging people to step down or apologize, and even then, they don't have to do something they don't owe me. But maybe you do - I basically risked my life FOR YOU and you wanted ME to step down? It's one thing to reject help you don't need, but to bite the hand that feeds you? How dare you! I said the same thing in Nick's mailbox.
I have no power to shut down VirPed. I don't know how to hack. The only reason given for that descriptor of me is an autism stereotype. "They all have hacking capabilities at that level" Nope, many of us don't. I'm computer dumb, and even if I wasn't, so much as leaving VirPed alone, I'd defend them from attacks if I could. Not everyone with autism is a hacker. I am more of a writer in terms of gifts than computers, meaning the computer in front of me.
My advocacy was, in fact, prompted by attempts to shut down VirPed. So no, Nick, you couldn't be more wrong about my desire to defend VirPed from religious abusers and quacks. Not everyone with autism is self-centered, and many empathic autistics may focus on children's issues, and those might be pedophiles as well.
Get anti-children's of the mix at every level! Let people converse freely! This is getting to be complete mayhem and ridiculousness! Everyone is blaming everyone else for "failing Max in 2017" when everyone did it, on a literal level. Just like the relationship between adults and children. People need to get over their pride and focus on the common good - if a 24-year-old American male wants to have a blog protected by the First Amendment, and also have freedom to assemble with children's rights survivors as such a blogger, mind your own doggone business and leave my blog alone. I've given everyone many warnings, and now all uninvited parties who fail to retreat are culpable, but especially anti-children's rights. I can solve everything myself, or with the help of a mother, at this point. I'm not dead yet, am I? Just a toy effigy. Not even a human being. I have my own agenda, so please don't ascribe one onto me...I know exactly what the problem is - you hate my anti-spanking trauma, because it goes too deep. Ain't that the truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.