One simple rule. Show about your parent status what is comfortable, and I will judge what is beneath, assuming there must be something beneath the account, and beneath the text, but claim ignorance as to what it is, presuming innocence to the parent, meaning the individual, in incremental question format.
You have to raise my alarm, meaning trigger my trauma. Generally, parent victimization is a trigger for me, when conflated with the child. When you whine about how you are burnt out, I judge whether that may lead to harming the child or not, but if you are vulnerable about it, it is merely tolerable din, and in the long run I'm glad you are coming forward and seeking help.
In order to be shunned, you have to defend a choice to refuse to be a gentle parent, with this meaning defending any controlling, punitive, or permissive behavior. "Permissive" does exist, and I am one of those permissive parents that regrettably make this movement look bad, by nature - we're talking sexual/behavioral neglect. A permissive parent not only refuses to punish, but doesn't set limits, usually in a corrupting way that often leads to role-reversals (parentification). Most abusive pedophiles are permissive, not punitive...Defending any harm to a child will get you on my ban list, and my righteous defamation list as well, meaning pro-social intercom.
When questioned, be honest to the court, and plead innocent and state your intentions in relation to your child, or guilty and apologize. Innocent means you did not lash out at your child out of anger, guilty means you did inflict those damages. You can be guilty, yet not guilty, and that means you are not entitled, but remorseful, in which case coming forward was the best thing you could do in the moment.
Don't expect me to be nice and gushy towards that thing attached to you, though sometimes it woos me over. The last time, the mother had a daughter just like I was, and was crying beneath the account (I could tell). With parents, sometimes, if you don't humble yourself to that level, I might find your victimization threatening. Most survivors of child sexual abuse can feign real tears, meaning rush them, and that actually is a way to shut off predation instincts - my trauma against parents is predation/anger, meaning I am angry at a gutteral level at abuse, but deem these parents safe...These pages have separate rules to fit my needs, and what I want to see on my pages, and Facebook only feigns a policy against page rules for peacekeepers. The rules are intended, by reality, to keep unwanted traffic out. Some of the rules are designed to assert forcibly that my trauma rules the roost on my page, and upholds the longstanding policy of parallel platform. I have no right to just order a page to conform to my trauma needs, and it is a religious requirement of mine to not ask for trauma accommodations unless it helps others as well. If its on another page, and I don't like it, I simply can avoid it. I get less freedom on my own pages, so I set rules down. This page might be considered a dormant pedophile.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.