Do I hate pedophiles?

 Many wonder whether I hate or love pedophiles. My stance as an advocate is very nuanced in nature, but I am pro-pedophile/anti-pedophilia-in-first-person. Anti-pedophilia-in-first-person here simply means a idealistic wish that the thread itself didn't exist, and it is a wish of many older children and teens who are born with the psychiatric disability.

Pro-pedophile means I'm certainly okay with you identifying when relevant. Please do, if I suspect you of child abuse, so I have a good reason to believe (but not 100% solid) that you are innocent. Say it with "I am" attached to the sentence, and you're good - maybe guilty, yet not guilty due to lack of entitlement. No human being who admits to and self-diagnoses with a psychiatric condition at that level has entitlement in relation to children, since children are the main targets of pedophilic abusers. If you are a pedophile, I don't care to know it unless you want me to, and you feel safe talking to me about it. But, coming out to me about such a burdensome subject tells me that you do want help in not hurting children. That is to be admired, as most adults abuse children, and most adults don't care - it's someone else's fault, and they are "a good parent/adult" and "the child needs a good spanking/whipping/punishment".

Pedophilia, however, is not a good thing at all. It is not the human being, but a disorder they have, much like any anxiety or mood disorder (which are genetically related to pedophilia, in fact). It is but one form of adult sexual entitlement, and only targets a certain age bracket - 0-13. It is part of something that is bad, meaning sexual entitlement in adults. It is a bad thing merely for its targeted age in terms of attraction. It is bad in the clinical, medical tense, but only is immoral when it leads to plotting against a child or disrespect of a child stemming from adult sexual entitlement. Disrespectful, demanding attitudes of perhaps dress enforcement, chastity enforcement, and so forth, are sexually entitled attitudes in adults. Pedophilia is merely the lobe in the brain, containing far removed, low-level fantasies that either are completely alien to real life and/or remind the pedophile of the consequences of their actions - pro-social fantasy. Fantasy rights in the 1990s meant a right to a "live woman". That's not what it means, at all, in the VirPed sense of the term. Just fantasy. That's all VirPed asks - mind your own business is what we really mean. When those fantasies lead to planning routes to groom and abuse a child, then don't do it, I'd agree...It is bad in the medical sense of the word, meaning a pedophile is either healthy or not healthy. A healthy pedophile is restraining in mental action, and connotational in terms of outward behavior.

I would not defriend anyone because they were a pedophile, and I'd be afraid to ask questions. Just let them talk. I would only pounce on a pedophile who abused a child in any way and defended it as a right - chewing them out, then so long. We know where you are headed, and pedophilia has nothing to do with it. Many pedophiles are the young, enlightened guy who supports the children's rights science 100%, is developmentally-informed in his attitude towards children, but is introverted and perhaps has very little to do with children. It is a specific form of locus of control where you see the child at your level, or above your level, in most cases. Children, to me, are a bit above me in a convicting way.

The depraved and defiled victimizing narcissists and prejudicial pedophiles will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them languish in the lake of fire and burning sulfur! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!