Parental rights abuse. It is the most common way that a child is abused in today's American society, yet the least reported form of abuse. It is an epidemic, basically an ideological crack epidemic - it's called a power high. I abstain from such, on grounds of my Christian family values, and seek to work WITH children. There is no such thing in the Bible or the Constitution as parental rights.
Many speak to me as a pedophile in terms of "right to protect children". No, you don't. It's called a DUTY to protect your child. "Parents protect" is a lie - they don't protect. Parents have the worst track record of protecting children than any other group of people. Even pedophiles, when understood under that banner, are safer around children than the average parent - just a bunch of guys with a far-removed attraction towards children, whereas the peacekeepers are the ones sexually abusing. But, they run this country, and most all of Congress is held by peacekeepers, so nothing can get done. Pedophiles are the ordinary guy who has a connotational attraction to children.
However, there is one group of people that is most fit at protection even more than me as a pedophile - the children themselves! I judge their own opinion on my safety towards them more than myself. The roles in any adult-child relationship is children self-protect, and parents/adults abstain. I abstain, by default, to the point of elimination of all worries for the child by me sacrificing for her, just as Christ sacrificed for His children. When I step out of line, a child issues a lawful and binding order by a stophand motion, stopping me from abusing her by assertiveness. What causes a child to be this assertive? No punishment or control in parenting, at all!
True love for a child is surrender of society's false authority over children. It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:
Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.
The Greek root word translated υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to surrender coming from surrender from parents, meaning parents surrender to the child their authority, and provide their every need, as an enemy, just as mankind is the enemy of God, and children are to be feared as such, leading to bondservice and righteous enslavement. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and literally translates to "stirring up" or "exasperating" children, and refers to damages imposed upon children, as denoted by the Eighth Commandment. The Tenth Commandment is also mentioned here, and is cross-referenced by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers not merely to wanting things from children, but wanting things to the point of seeking to impose on a child, based on the attitude of "I am a good parent/teacher/adult, and so I am deserving of respect".
That entitlement is the backbone of parental rights - that parents deserve respect just for being parents, and that parents are not responsible for their own actions due to "stress". You don't get rights as an adult in relation to children unless you earn it, and even then, you don't get it just for brandishing a glorified title in relation to children, such as "parent". Parents have no rights, period, as long as they exist and stand tall over their children in the form of false authority. True authority does not control children who don't know any better, but legal adults who do know better, but don't care.
Kill every parents, and validate every victim, for there are a lot of them, and a lot of parents doing the harm. I am a menace to society merely for being an adult with an the parental lobe of an adult. It is useless pointing out the sexual nature of that entitled cord unless you don't believe certain children's testimony. A pedophile is an antisocial parent, just like how every parent is antisocial in nature. I HATE parental rights. Give it to the children instead.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.