Pro-social indentured servitude, pro-social attachment - An example of good Christian parenting

 Many parents in this country abuse their children, meaning most all. 94% of parents spank and punish their children, with 70% of adults approving of it. All adults hate children at some level, in some form, myself included. I myself am a flawed adult in relation to children, born with a depraved sin nature.

I am not really a parent, meaning of the legal kind, but might fit the natural definition of a parent. Parental love is denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and is defined in 1 Corinthians 13:4-8 KJV:

Charity suffereth long, and is kind, charity envieth not, charity vaunteth not yourself, is not puffed up, doth not behaveth himself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinking no evil; rejoiceth not in inequity, rejoiceth not in inequity, beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things. Charity never faileth, but whether that be prophecies, they shall fail, whether they be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

This verse about love, or charity, in relation to children, refers to a form of paying penance for one's existence as a parent/adult in relation to children. Such penance can be understood as a form of indentured servitude towards the child, with said child being above the parent in terms of importance, yet smaller in terms of size, stature, and oppression...It is not a begrudging penance, but a penance that is rejoiced in nature. Earning the friendship and affection of one's child, while not deserving it one bit.

All adults, by default, have a depraved and entitled sin nature in relation to children, and are deserving of DEATH and DESTRUCTION for our mere existence in relation to children. Parents are to submit and surrender to the child's every vulnerable need as an enemy, just as mankind is culpable in God's eyes for mere existence, and must pay penance as such, with "God" referring allegorically to a child in relation to her parents. I have no clue what it is like to be a child, and neither does any adult, and so any assumption as to what a child needs speaking over them is the moral crime of entitlement by way of antisocial "assume"...Not all children are verbal, and so then antisocial "assume" would be assuming that YOUR word as a parent conflates with them.

I am bound and beholden to children in a servile manner, meaning I am silent, stoic, and disciplined in relation to children, in the form of bondservice. Think chains and shackles. Think attendant. Think ragdoll. Think vending machine. That's all I am to them. In a relationship with a child, they and their needs are the center of everything, and I take back seat. I'm just scenery.

A child is an extension of God, as it states in Matthew 25:45-46 KJV:

Then shall he answer him, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not unto one of the least of these, ye did it not to me. And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

If you harm or abuse a child, you abuse God, and if you hate children, you hate God. We all, as adults, hate children just for existing with parental drives geared to control and punish them. If you can admit this about yourself at any level that takes action, you are not an abuser. If you defend your hatred of children by defending it as a "right", you are an abuser to me, and an identified parent. I myself might not be the best person around children, due to the sexually entitled connotations I project onto them, and thus they owe me nothing. I am grateful that they can be forgiving, because such is undeserving.