Monday, February 22, 2021

Why "pedophile entitlement" doesn't exist as a standalone concept

Many here in the children's rights community believe in a concept called "pedophile entitlement". In this past, this was mentioned as a standalone concept, back when we knew little about pedophiles as an entity. As the first pedophile extension of God's Church, meaning children's rights, I am aware that pedophiles are not entitled just for being an adult, and unfair entitlement distinctions lead to oppression and abuse against more vulnerable populations. Pedophiles are a vulnerable population, and a victim group by my standard, but at the same time a chunk of a very broad abuser group - adults. There is always a better way to protect children than calling out one's mental health issues. A pedophile that can be a victim of an abusive adult, in which case the child/pedophile is the victim and the parent is the perpetrator.

Pedophile entitlement is a feminist lie from pro-parent rally feminists who were not ready to accept their own responsibility towards their children, in terms of lawful child abuse such as spanking and corporal punishment. At that time, our movement was openly hostile abuse. Nowadays, most people here simply want abuse to end...I myself AM a feminist, but in the way any decent, chivalrous conservative man would be - holding doors, seeing women as equal yet different in their roles in society. I would indeed speak to my son firmly yet surely if he ever were to disrespect a woman or girl. 

Pedophile entitlement does not exist - only parent/adult entitlement in relation to children, and male entitlement in relation to rape cases (some antisocial pedophiles rape women instead, while projecting a child). I am not entitled merely because I have a self-diagnosis of pedophilic disorder. I am entitled merely by way of being an adult in relation to children, or the past child of anyone.

Adult entitlement is denoted, in the Bible, by the Tenth Commandment, which reads in Exodus 20:17 KJV:

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, or his ass, or anything that belongs to thy neighbor.

The Greek root word translated "covet" is נמםוד (Latin: lachmod) and refers to not simply wanting sexual favors from or use of a child, but to the point of seeking to imposing said want upon a child, leading to fornication/abuse. This is repeated in the New Testament by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektes), and refers to the entitled attitude of "I am a good, loving parent/adult towards children, and so I have the right to punish/control/adultify/spousify a child". 

What is the collective result of this individual entitlement upon adults. Compress. Shouting muzzle. Laughing face. You shout in the wind, and then when nothing comes back for you in terms of rights as a child, you become even more agitated, to the point of full rebellion against an adult. It is openly-felt terror sometimes, during spankings/assaults from parents, and otherwise a reluctant tolerance of a parent's presence, meaning embarrassment when parent show up...My mother is a gentle parent, so when she shows up at a place unexpected, my eyes light up, and I'm happy! Even at age 24. 

I am a depraved, entitled adult who is deserving of nothing but DEATH and DESTRUCTION merely for existing in relation to a child, and am her enemy, just as mankind is the enemy of God, and must submit to God, with "God" representing the child, figuratively. A child is an extension of God, and if you harm or abuse a child, you are abusing God, thus committing blasphemy.

I am not entitled because I am a pedophile. Nothing in life is because I am a pedophile, even things I have done in the past. I have a mental illness, and have earned my keep in choosing not to abuse a child (and I don't even complain), so I deserve my mental health rights, with my pedophilic disorder treated as equal to all other mental disorders - meaning with compassion, listening, and validation. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Righteous co-sleeping: Why God wants parents to sleep next to their children

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice for a parent to make. This is a common attitude from American parents. Most ...