Tuesday, January 19, 2021

The evolutionary reasons why all parents are antisocial in nature: Why we need to ban spanking and criminalize parents

Many people don't like to hear that parents are bad or evil. However, that's the truth. Parenting research divides parents, meaning the cords, into two main categories - pro-social or antisocial. The concept of anti-parent denotes a very grim, pessimistic, and nihilistic view of parents - no parent is good. No parent is pro-social. Therefore, all parents are antisocial, and have a wicked, depraved nature. Children are good, but the parents aren't. Parents are evil in nature. All of them, and need to be chastened up into being good.

A parent is an entitled being. Entitlement, in a parent, is prohibited by the Tenth Commandment, and is denoted by the Greek root word πγεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to wanting things from children to the point to seeking to impose item on a child, leading to theft by way of child abuse. "Child abuse" refers to damages inflicted upon a child such as pain, shame, and/or fornication, guided by controlling attitudes. The best way to understand entitlement is by way of the concept of line of intent, meaning guilty intent (mens rea) leading to guilty action (actus reus), with the guilty action coloring the guilty intent. Any self-interest imposed on others, meaning coerced or forced upon others in a way that the other person finds offensive and/or is defended as a "right" in relation to another person, is entitlement. Parents are naturally entitled beings due to their controlling nature in relation to their child, designed as a part of their inherently sinful nature.

A parent is designed to control its young, and do so coercively. A parent refers to an entitled cord, meaning a entitled thread encased in an encasement. There are two types of parents, classified in terms of means of control:

  1. Physically aggressive parents (ex. spanking, yelling, time-out)
  2. Pedophiles (sexually aggressive parents)
I am of the latter category - a minority in modern society. I control not in the realm of discipline, but parental "affection". When a child is mad at me, I fall asleep. Think jumping on top of me, punching me as I'm down, and I just take it, because I know I deserve it merely for existing...It's a gaslighting sort of response, like flipping a lighter and causing me to pass out. I've actually been assaulted in a planned, pro-social manner. I can't fight back. Most parents have no choice, when cornered by a child, but to fight back, due to fight-or-flight responses.

Contrary to incomplete research, I find that a pedophile, when they stick to the program, is easier to reform than an ordinary, physically aggressive parent. Physical aggression is a higher level urge, in a way that is closer and more difficult to control (I've struggled with that as a child), whereas sexual aggression is much easier to control, because it is more distant. It is something that sort of reels out, and then you follow, in the case that you are stupid and are alone with a child. Perhaps you came home from a party and had a few beers as well. "I just had to" is an excuse, as you could eliminated any of those variables, and the abuse wouldn't occur...Tine-out, in gentle parenting format. Avoid children in order to decompress, and have time to yourself. As long as it doesn't impose on the rights of the child, it's okay for parents to do.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Time-in: Why mammary closeness is the biblical way of doing time-in

Many parents think that time-out is a safe alternative to corporal punishment of children. This is a common attitude amongst American parent...