Skimmed through an article

 I skimmed through an article about the sin of lust. I do believe lust is not a good thing, but tends to involve another person when it gets to the point of a moral problem, or else is sexual thoughts and/or random nudity flaunted out in the open, perhaps with gaslighting intent.

The Greek root word πορνεία (Latin: porneia) refers to, in the context of this police interrogation, any sexual stimuli that you perceive is directed towards you, towards others, or else thin air, based on the codex wording of the text, any images that might be included in the text, and the mixture of these two, as well as other factors...The main moral legal question is "Did it portray intent to sexually titillate or offend others" and the question is to be asked critically to the offender by the plaintiff, with the plaintiff being the person(s) perceiving the sexual abuse online.

I will be honest that I am capable of sexual abuse against a child in that way, namely mentioning her out of carelessness in a way that she might find sexually defamatory, but I will stray away from any sort of sexual indulgence concerning any specific or imagined child victim/target. I simply won't do it. I refuse to put trauma survivors through that agony. That is fornication of the textual variety.

Fornication is a catch-all basin term that includes all the sex crime laws under the Law of Moses, and that would have included public nudity and intergenerational marriage. For the last one, custom included in the meaning of that Greek word had it so that young men and women had to be of the same age, or else curse the bride's father for allowing his daughter to be "loose" enough to go with a much older man. That society did have standards, and this standard does work today. A loose young woman, who was free, was seen as in danger of exploitation, and the father was asleep at the switch. It wasn't just about sexism and misogyny, but other factors as well.