It's okay to not be okay: Breaking the anti-pedophile mental health stigma

Many adults think that pedophilia is not a valid mental illness. Most adults know that pedophilia is a mental illness, including most mental health professionals. However, the fact of the matter is that pedophilia is a treatable mental illness, like the others in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5).

A pedophile is not an anger packet. A pedophile is a human being who has a sexual preference for children under age 14. Most pedophilia is a secondary diagnosis to autism, with the individual with pedophilic autism focusing on children in terms of knowledge and social preference. Most pedophiles are ambiverts, meaning they either want to be alone, or else with children. "Autism" means "one with", with a pedophile being one with children as per their autism. 

Most pedophiles need to accept their fantasies. The Greek root word denoting fornication is πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refer to sexual activity in a man outside of two specific ventricles - sex with his wife, or sex with himself without pornography. The more you masturbate to thoughts of children, the more you feel comfortable doing so. But, a simple sexual fantasy about a child, perhaps under the covers, will not lead a man to pornography. I myself masturbate regularly for health reasons, but avoid pornography like the plague. I like my fantasies, and have committed to God to keep the righteous masturbation going. Giving up child fantasies for survivors is actually an infraction under my Christian faith, and an offense once a child is harmed sexually. It is a myth that the word πορνεία completely outlaws pedophilia. It only outlaws child sexual abuse as well as pornography. If you can go without those as a pedophile, you can be saved as a Christian. The "impossible standard" for pedophiles is not that impossible - just masturbate without pornography, and then the rest solves itself. 

Most pedophiles are not a danger to children. Most pedophiles are instead more of a danger to themselves than anyone else. Many cases of pedophilia also come with major depression as a primary diagnosis alongside the autism. Most pedophiles polled at the pedophile support group Virtuous Pedophiles (VirPed) shared some level of suicidal ideation, with suicide being a regular topic at VirPed, with some members posting about their suicide attempts, and complaining about how they ended up in the hospital instead. 

It is okay to not be okay. Being a pedophile is a form of not being mentally okay, but what shame is there for asking for help? There should be no shame in asking for help as a pedophile. However, pedophiles are constantly shamed and suspected merely for admitting their condition. 

However, I have identified both by trauma and by pedophilia, and that is what the survivors want with a pedophile who does the messiah. I have gotten a lot done. Most trauma-informed mental health professionals are now informed on how to treat pedophiles, albeit with a quiet welcome. The key argument in favor of pedophiles that I made is that pedophiles need the same thing as victims of sexual abuse - listening and validation. Some pedophiles may need some extra accountability, but they usually come to those conclusions on their own. Sometimes, the pedophile may need guidance as a nudge to go in the right direction.

Pedophile stigma did not start with children's rights. Pedophile stigma ultimately comes from the Holy Roman Empire, meaning once Rome took over the Western Christian Church. Whenever you admitted to attraction to children in the Holy Roman Empire, you swiftly lost all of your friends and family, and this stigma lasted until today. In the Early Church, admitting to pedophilia was not a big deal, as many men had the disorder, and those men were coveted prizes for the women of the church. If a pedophile had a squeaky clean record, they were appointed clergy, and held the responsibility to take in orphaned children. 

I am a pedophile myself, and I don't blame fellow survivors for the hatred I face just because I have the mental heath disorder of pedophilia. They just played into an existing prejudice that existed. In the 1970s, the first person to bring up pedophilia or child sexual abuse was the pedophile, with the word "pedophile" being synonymous with the word "abuser". This stigma also affected victims of child sexual abuse, as they were called pedophiles as well just for self-advocating for a trauma need. Most trauma survivors here at children's rights, in the 1970s, had to attract pedophile support a certain way, namely by gaining just the right opposition that they change their mind on pedophiles - and they wanted a mentally disabled pedophile to come and keep them company. The key point that they wanted opposition on was the claim that pedophiles "are immune to trauma" - I have trauma, and that is what survivors need to hear from a pedophile. They will not take advantage of trauma. They want to listen to a pedophile's heartbeat in that regard. The survivors still are listening in on everything that I write, and send me airborne messages that are encouraging and validating in nature. They also showed me their trauma scars, and I got angry at their abuser.

It is okay to ask for help as a pedophile, meaning there should be no shame in asking for help with sexual desires for children. There is support available. One good resource is the Association for Sexual Abuse Prevention (ASAP), where you can find a good therapist who will understand how to treat a pedophile. I have also opened up the doors to pedophiles at trauma-informed family therapy practices. Word of my case of pedophilia will travel far and wide, slowly but surely, and then society will include pedophiles. Best wishes to all pedophiles in finding the right therapist!

Santa Claus: Why Santa should not even threaten to bring coal for Christmas

Many parents have done it. Threatening children with Santa as a behavioral modification tool. Most American parents think that Santa should have both a "nice" and a "naughty" list, and that those on the "naughty" list should get coal for Christmas. However, the fact of the matter is that enlisting Santa for behavioral modification alone is child abuse.

God's Law on child abuse is spelled out in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers here to offenses or damages, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. Threatening for Santa to bring coal for Christmas hurts children's feelings, and is officially an offense once defended in open court. If you have said this, tell children "I talked to Santa, and he never brings coal ever. I was wrong". Avoiding offense in children is the key to a happy Christmas season, and that starts by apologizing for hurting your child's feelings in the slightest. If you are a child, fearing not getting presents that you pine for as a form of punishment always hurts a child's feelings, and when you defend Santa's so-called "right" to punish "naughty" children with a bucket of coal, you are entitled in your offense of a child. This commandment cross-references the Eighth and the Tenth Commandments, with the Apostle Paul here convicting a group of Greek Christian parents who brought into the church their pagan custom of patrias potestas, which is a Latin phrase roughly translated to "power to the parent", including the power to threaten children, even in a feigned way. Paul, contrary to popular legend, opposed any and all punitive treatment of a child in his secular writings. 

Christian parents in the Early Church were prosecuted merely for threatening children with punishment, and that included feigned threats. Any time a parent feigned a threat to punish a child, they were investigated and prosecuted by the church authorities. Today, this moral law can be applied to threatening children with Santa Claus bringing coal for Christmas. Threatening children with punishment hurts the child's feelings, and is officially an offense when the parent defends this tactic as a so-called "right". 

Most parents plan on giving children their presents anyway. However, children can't tell the difference between a feigned threat and a real threat. I myself was made to worry about getting coal for Christmas, as I was a prideful child that always was getting into fights with adults. I actually had reason to believe that I would be punished by Santa for my behaviors.

No child should have to fear getting coal for Christmas. No child is "naughty" enough not to deserve presents. Children are going to shout. Children are going to cry. Children are going to pout. Santa should be forgiving to all of this, and should deliver their presents as asked. 

Children growing up in the Early Church were not taught to believe in a gift-giver. Instead, Christmas was a simple day off from work to spend time with family and friends. At Christmas dinner, parents gave their children presents, and were grateful for giving to children. There was never a recorded case of parents refusing gifts to "naughty" children. Instead, the gift giving was symbolic to the gifts given by the three kings to the Christ child. All child births were a big party then, but Christ's birth was special in a harrowing way, as everyone knew the fate of the Christ child. Mary was worried sick for baby Jesus, because she knew that the Christ child would be executed for a crime He didn't commit. Mary was an attachment parent, and tried to script Christ through all of His being tested, but He knew what to say before she could finish her sentence. Christ was religiously astute by the age of three, before even studying the Bible on His own. Christmas should simply be a solemn observation of Christ's birth, with Christmas gatherings being a birthday party for Christ. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through threatening children with Santa will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning lake of fire and burning sulfur, prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent!

Thanksgiving dinner: Why children have the right to be offended by physical contact

Many parents will be celebrating Thanksgiving this season. This is a time for children to be with extended family. Grandma may want a hug. But, does the child want the hug? Most American parents punish children merely for not accepting a hug from grandma or another member of extended family. However, even the mere consent violation on the part of adults is considered child abuse under God's Law.

God's Law on child abuse is spelled out in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers here to offenses or damages, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement, with this entitlement including any forced affection defended in open court. Ultimately, in the context of Thanksgiving dinner, this commandment is referring to physical battery, meaning any time a child objects even to the slightest of touch, adults should respect the child's wishes. Usually, parents as well as extended family insist on children hugging them as a way to "be sociable", and usually, the parent is the main party in the entitled pressure imposed on children to hug or be affectionate with an extended family member. Let the child's consent be your guide this Thanksgiving, meaning if your child is averse to hugging someone in the family, they should not be forced to, as any time a child is forced into the slightest of touch, it is officially an offense. Children have the right to be offended by anything an adult does to hurt their feelings, including even in the case of the slightest of unwanted affection. This commandment cross-references the Eighth and the Tenth Commandments, with the Apostle Paul here convicting a group of Greek Christian parents who brought into the church their pagan custom of patrias potestas, which is a Latin phrase roughly translating to "power to the parent", including the power to impose punitive sanctions onto children. Paul, contrary to popular legend, opposed any and all punitive parenting in his secular writings. Attachment parenting was banned under Roman law, but the Early Christians did it anyway, obeying God over men. Even in the Old Testament, touching another Jew without consent was seen as physical battery, and could only happen in the context of a courtroom.

It is okay for a child to be offended by being forced to hug members or the extended family. Whenever physical contact with a child is rejected by that child, it should be respected. Whenever a child is emotionally hurt by the physical touch coming from an adult, that constitutes an official offense. Whenever a child refuses to give you a hug, you should be willing to apologize to that child, lest it become entitlement on the part of all adults involved.

Most of the time, children can tell intuitively whether a specific adult is harboring a sexual narcissist. In that situation, children will avoid the adult and will refuse to be affectionate with the adult. If a child ever refuses to hug a member of extended family, or any adult for that matter, that wish should be respected. 

Children are not your property, meaning a child is an autonomous human being. If an adult doesn't want a hug, nobody questions why. Why is it that children usually offended in this way? A child should have the right to be offended when they don't want to hug or kiss a member of extended family, or in the case with any adult for that matter. 

Thanksgiving is a time for thanks. Be thankful for your child in every respect. The core antonym of gratitude is entitlement, and that includes parental entitlement. Whenever you even are angry with a child, including for refusing to hug grandma or be affectionate with a member of the extended family, you are entitled. Any adult anger is entitlement in the eyes of God, and so if you lose your cool in forcing your child to be affectionate with extended family, you definitely need to apologize for losing your cool with them, and commit never to being angry with a child ever again. Your children have the right to be offended when their feelings are hurt by way of non-consensual affection. No child wants to be forced to be affectionate.

The depraved and entitled parents who punish their children for refusal to be physically affectionate will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into the abyss which is the Hell of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent! 

Child sexual abuse prevention: Individual responsibility for adults attracted to children

Many adults in American society believe in the concept of collective responsibility. Collective responsibility amounts to other adults stopping a predatory adult from raping and sexually assaulting a child. However, there are things an adult at-risk for sexually abusing a child can do to stop themselves from sexually abusing a child.

It is a myth that an adult can have a "predestined fate" to rape or sexually assault a child. Most sexual abusers of children instead act on a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to sexually abuse a child. Most child sexual abusers are not pedophiles, as any old adult could rape or sexually assault a child under the right/wrong conditions.

The Greek root word translated "fornication" in the Bible is πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refers to anything outside of proper ventricles, as understood then. The proper sexual ventricles for a man is sex with his wife, and masturbation without pornography. Mere masturbation without pornography was encouraged in that society then, and most men in particular made a commitment to God to masturbate whenever necessary to keep safe from sexual immorality (see also 1Thess. 5:22). 

Most child sexual abuse comes from a repressed secondary sexual attraction towards children, meaning usually teenage girls. Most adults are unaware of their secondary sexual attractions toward children, until it comes out sideways onto the nearest child, like a ton of bricks. The idea is to spend away this adult attraction to children through righteous masturbation, meaning masturbation without pornography in order to stay out of trouble. 

Parent attractions in Christian households in the Early Church came in the form of a criss-cross, with sexual attractions between father and daughter happening in mutually unrequited setup, with boys being attracted to their mothers in the form of a dead end. Usually, parents and children then masturbated to sexual thoughts of each other. 

All adults are responsible for their sexual behavior around children. All adults are capable of raping and/or sexually assaulting a child under the right/wrong condition. The key to avoiding the sexual abuse of a child is righteous avoidance. Part of righteous avoidance is righteous masturbation, meaning adults then regularly spent away attractions to children by way of masturbating to thoughts of that child. When you fight back any sexual desire, it comes out sideways onto the nearest child, like a ton of bricks. 

Most men are afraid of masturbation because they fear that they may be led to pornography. However, masturbation can exist apart from pornography, and I myself regularly masturbate to sexual thoughts of children for health reasons. I had a brief pornography addiction that lasted a few nights, before I simply masturbated to the imagery without the imagery present - and that ended my short lived pornography habit. Masturbation without pornography feels a bit like accomplishment, and a bit like relief of sexual tension. "Stay above it all" only does so much - you need to masturbate righteously to thoughts of things you can't have in real life. 

Pedophiles are capable of child sexual abuse. I myself sexually abused a child by way of street harassment. Ultimately, I was an "infatuation" groomer, meaning I had crushes on children that came like train cars, with everyone around me hoping for the caboose. I was an obvious abuser, meaning I bragged to everyone about my child crushes. I lacked boundaries then. Most pedophilic rape comes from the same place, with the pedophilic rapist usually having a low IQ. 1 in 4 pedophiles sexually abuse children, usually in the form of sexual harassment. 

Most pedophiles are incapable of repressing their sexual drive towards children. When a pedophile announces "I'm cured", they surely are not, and simply have repressed those desires lower than their awareness. There is no cure for pedophilia, and there never will be. All adults have a little bit of attraction to children, and they need to spend that attraction away by way of masturbation for health reasons. Usually, it only takes one or two sessions of masturbation to spend away an ordinary adult attraction to children. If it takes a lot longer, you are a pedophile, and you need to own up to it. Most pedophiles are only a danger to themselves, meaning they usually are anguished in their self-hatred, to the point of suicidal ideation. Some pedophiles with major depression do take their own life.

A pedophile is not an sexual anger packet directed towards a child. A pedophile instead is an individual with a sexual preference for children under age 14. Most pedophiles have a co-morbid diagnosis of moderate-severe autism that is centered on children in terms of knowledge and social skills. A pedophile is usually an ambivert, meaning they like either to be left alone or be left with children. Most actual pedophile are the last people to rape or sexually assault a child. Most child sexual abuse comes from a secondary attraction to teenage girls that most men in particular have. Most women also have a secondary attraction to teenage boys.

The depraved and decadent, defiled adults who rape and sexually assault a child will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into the abyss which is the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent!

Crying: Why crying is never bad behavior in children

Many parents think that children usually cry to "undermine parental authority". This is a common belief amongst American parents. Most American parents punish a child who cries over every little thing. The fact of the matter is that children never cry to "undermine parental authority".

The Bible, in terms of the text, commands a secure attachment between parent and child. See Colossians 3:20 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and is better translated as "trust", as in "trust your parents in all things". This commandment refers to secure rest in the Agape love of parents. Ultimately, this commandment refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. The biblical context, when used as a guidepost, tells us how to form a secure bond with your child. A good place to start is to respond to the every cry of a child.

Whenever children growing up in the Early Church cried, mothers cooed before picking up the child, and from there, she diagnosed the need before meeting it. Maybe the child was tired. Maybe the child was hungry. Maybe the child needed mom's milk. Maybe, the child needed mom, period. Whatever the child needed, they got it.

Customary law in the Early Church understood five basic categories of needs behind the child's cries; food, water, shelter, transportation, and attachment - and the greatest of these needs is attachment! Sleep was conflated with attachment then, as co-sleeping was the norm in the Early Church. But, usually, all a child needs is YOU. 

Crying, at any age, is developmentally appropriate behavior. Most children cry in order to communicate a vulnerable need that needs being met. Christian parents in the Early Church knew more than parents today that crying wasn't anything personal with a child. Children just needed to confide in parents for their needs in the only way they knew how. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punishing crying in children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering the second death which is the lake of fire and burning sulfur! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Expanding child abuse definitions: Why the Bible calls for stronger child abuse definitions

Many parents think that the ancients in the Bible had no concept of childhood, let alone child abuse. Most American parents support the current child abuse definitions. However, the Bible has its own definition of child abuse - whatever the child victim perceives as abuse. 

The Greek root word denoting parental entitlement is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and is defined as, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. Unofficially speaking, parental entitlement consists of a parent being sorely disappointed when they don't get what they feel that they deserve from children. In fact, any parent anger directed towards a child was deemed parental entitlement in the Early Church, and was roundly condemned as such. Whenever this sense of entitlement in parents was perceived by a child as offensive or damaging, it was deemed child abuse. See also Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers here to offenses or damages, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement, with this entitlement including any parent anger directed towards a child. Child abuse in the Bible, as a legal concept, is defined as entitlement in parents, leading to offense in children. The idea is to avoid offense in children. The key behind avoiding offense in children is to be willing to give a meaningful apology whenever you hurt your child's feelings. However, if you offend your child by way of losing your cool with your child, you should definitely give an apology for losing your cool with your child, and then commit to never losing your cool with your child ever again, as losing your cool as a parent, in and of itself, is entitlement. This commandment goes without saying that punishing your child is a moral crime against the child, because it is done out of anger, and offends the child, in all cases. This commandment cross-references the Eighth and the Tenth Commandments, with the Apostle Paul here convicting a group of Greek Christian parents who brought into the church their pagan custom of patrias potestas, which is a Latin phrase roughly translating to "power to the parent", namely the power to impose punitive sanctions on children, such as spanking or other forms of punishment of children. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punitive parenting in his secular writings. Attachment parenting was banned under Roman law, but the Early Christians did it anyway, obeying God over men. 

The Greek root word translated "they be discouraged" is αθυμέω (Latin: athumeo) and refers here to long-term damages, namely trauma. The ancients had a basic understanding of childhood trauma. Whenever a child grew up to be atheist, it was seen as a sign of childhood trauma from abuse, not simply the atheist being a "lost soul". 

The ancients also had a concept of child sexual abuse. The Greek root word translated "fornication" is πορνεία (Latin: porneia), and refers in this context to any sexual interaction between an adult and a child. Any time a child perceived sexual advances from an adult, it was deemed child sexual abuse, even if the child liked it. Child sexual abuse was rare in biblical times, meaning it almost never happened. Most adults then masturbated when they developed an attraction to a child. 

Child abuse was prosecuted in the Early Church by way of church investigation. In most cases, an abused child confided into a church official about having abusive parents. When the child confided into the church official, the church elders subpoenaed the parents to testify in court. If the parents defended themselves in any way, they were excommunicated from the church for their entitlement alone. 

The Bible is an anti-spanking document. All 88 books of the Bible - from Genesis to Revelation - were written by Jews, with no Jew worth mentioning ever defending the punitive treatment of children. Even King Solomon recommended attachment parenting for the little ones in his secular writings. The rod of correction was a sentence for crime, in the form of 40 minus 1 lashes. A judicial whipping then could only take place within the confines of a courtroom, and only as a final warning before putting a young adult to death. No minor child was ever whipped, as children were seen then as immune to prosecution under the Law.

America is a Christian nation, with this nation being founded on Judeo-Christian family values. We as a society glean from the Bible and its context as to how to live and treat others with respect. However, the Bible was sloppily translated, with some of this being intentional as a means of keeping a pagan tradition going. However, the Bible is clear on child abuse, even with the pro-spanking lobby glossing it over - avoid offense in your child.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

"Spare the rod, spoil the child": Why the rod verses in Proverbs are repealed verses

Many parents believe the Bible says "spare the rod, spoil the child". This is a common phrase attributed to the Bible by parents. Most parents think that the Bible commands them to spank and punish their children. However, the fact of the matter is that "spare the rod, spoil the child" refers to a few verses in the book of Proverbs that mention the rod as a form of judicial corporal punishment. 

Arguably the most quoted of these rod verses is Proverbs 13:24 KJV:

He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he who loveth him chasteneth him betimes. 

The Hebrew word for "son" is ben and refers to a mature Jewish son. The Hebrew word translated "rod" is shebet and refers here to a switch, administered to the bare back as a form of judicial corporal punishment. This verse ultimately refers to the 40 minus 1 lashes. In the Old Testament, it was unlawful to strike another Jew outside of a courtroom, with this protection also extending to children. Minor children were never whipped for anything in the Old Testament.

The 7 verses in Proverbs that mention the rod are repealed verses. Christ repealed the harsh legal punishments of the Old Testament with His Work on the cross. The book of Proverbs contains no parenting advice whatsoever. However, the Bible does weigh in on the spanking issue. See Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers here to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement, with this entitlement including any parent anger directed towards a child. It is not enough to simply give up spanking, or any punishment for that matter - you need to avoid offense in your child. Avoiding offense and apologizing to children go hand in hand. The key to avoiding offense in a child is to be willing to give a meaningful apology whenever you hurt your child's feelings. However, if you lose your cool with your child, you should definitely apologize to your child for losing your cool with them, and then commit never to losing your cool as a parent ever again, as losing your cool alone as a parent, in and of itself, is entitlement. This commandment goes without saying that spanking or punishment of children is prohibited in the Bible, as any punishment of a child both offends the child and comes from parent anger directed towards a child. This commandment cross-references the Eighth and the Tenth Commandments, with the Apostle Paul here convicting a group of Greek Christian parents who brought into the church their pagan custom of pqtrias potestas, which is a Latin phrase roughly translating to "power to the parent", including the power to impose punitive sanctions onto children, such as spanking or other forms of punishment. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punitive parenting in his secular writings. Attachment parenting was banned under Roman law, but the Early Christians did it anyway, obeying God over men.

The most common form of punishment meted out in the broader Greco-Roman world was an open-handed spanking to the bare bottom. The European pagans were brutal towards their children. However, Paul would have none of that pagan custom in the Early Christian Churches of God. Punitive parents were treated by the church authorities as church infiltrators, with the parent being excommunicated from the church whenever they defended their choice to spank or punish their children on church grounds. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!