Why anger at a child is sin

 Many parents in this country - most, if not all - get angry with their children. Some regret it, some defend it, and varying shades in between. Some types of parenting, namely authoritative parenting, allow for legal "traditions" that involve the parenting calming down before administering a premeditated physical battery.

Matthew 5:21-22 KJV:

Ye have heard that it was said of them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whomever shall kill shall be in danger of judgment: But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shalt say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of Hell-fire.

Now, parents do get angry, but if you use it to berate and verbally abuse your child, it is sin. Anger is only acceptable in the legal realm towards another adult, namely when charging and interrogating fellow believers and fellow adults for moral legal offenses. Once cannot interrogate a child, since children are exempt from judgment.

Interrogating a child, meaning raising your voice and questioning them out of anger, is perjury, since children cannot be judged for any moral crime they may commit. Any unbridled anger at a child is, in fact, sin, and a form of entitlement when it intended to manipulate or control the child. 

It is okay to feel anger, as we all do. No human emotion is banned unless it begins to plot against one's neighbor, including a child, in terms of entitled drives and demands. The idea is to do the opposite of YOUR personal abusive traits (and don't preach out loud if you don't). If you feel like striking a child, stifle that urge, and return to the conversation after putting yourself in time-out. If you are frustrated, channel the anger into therapeutic writing, meaning typing a whole Word document and filling it with anger at your child, then deleting it and shredding it. The idea is to avoid speaking to your child unless spoken to, and to hold in urges to punish a child to correct them. The goal is pro-social bowl, created by a pro-social judgmental attitude, meaning you can have your fleeting judgments about your child, and you should not directly repress the anger. The idea is to feel it in another setting, meaning avoiding angry behaviors, while allowing yourself unfair thoughts concerning children, and maybe even dwelling in them in a way that is positioned away from the child...Thoughts are not a crime, but actions stemming those thoughts color those thoughts as impure. The more you avoid a certain anti-child drive, and sequester it to your own imagination and thoughts, the safer you are around your child and other children.

I myself am allowed sexual thoughts about children, but only at a certain level where I do not want children to the point of seeking to impose said want on a child. "Seeking...impose" are key words here, meaning you can want anything from your child, but are you willing to accept that your child cannot give it, perhaps due to immature development and/or mental health issues. Simply fantasizing sexually about a child is morally meaningless, and good for one's health. However, wanting to visit a child, and seeking such while disregarding any notice that I might abuse a child is adult sexual entitlement, meaning I want sex from a child, and am following that feeling TOWARDS the child instead of AWAY from the child. It is called pro-social fantasy, meaning the more I do it, the less I am inclined to seek out a real child, because I have enough of what I want in my mind. Wanting more, and wanting to do something with a real child, and voicing it as a plan, or else planning secretly, is entitlement towards a child. Thoughts are not a crime, however, as long as they aren't shared, in which case the expression would be filthy talk (Eph. 6:4).

It is not a sin to feel anything for one's child, and taking that attitude alone is unhealthy, and sets you up for defeat. Don't repress those unfair thoughts, but center them by avoidance of their behavioral outcome. As a pedophile, that's what I do. I have unfair thoughts about children all the time, and many times go all the way with them, usually thinking of an escape. Then, I wake up, and know how delusional it would be to think I could ever get that from a child in my lifetime...It'll never happen, and if you think it could, I will shut that down immediately in this movement. Pro-social fantasy is healthier...It is turning a parental protective drive inwards against itself. It makes one feel safe and secure around children at the end of the treatment, in a segregated fashion. You can admire them from afar, but you are not to speak to them, and that is drilled into you.

Let the depraved pro-spanking parents/fornicators BURN in torrents of fire and burning sulfur! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!